Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Asked him before on here about the commentary being all about the betting for him and most other commentators and he denied it. That race just gone is a perfect example.
Show More
Jun 23, 2018 -- 5:07PM, Deltâ wrote:
i thought he didnt deny they had to mention the fav ..
He refuted the notion that they had to when someone else posted. As I said before you even know by his tone as to how the 'favourite' is going in a race.
iirc - he sayed the only guide they were given was to mention the fav
May 16, 2018 -- 5:09PM, ratpack wrote:
That a reference (not constant) to the favourite should be made is the only part of that which is true.
Thank You. Most UK commentators seem to give far more than a reference unfortunately, as though every punter is just a favourite betting idiot. Pity commentators have been asked to reference favourites in the first place, a ridiculous directive.
That a reference (not constant) to the favourite should be made is the only part of that which is true.
Thank You. Most UK commentators seem to give far more than a reference unfortunately, as though every punter is just a favourite betting idiot. Pity commentators have been asked to reference favourites in the first place, a ridiculous directive.
Delta is right. Though that might only be the on course caller.
If that's the case its one thing 'mentioning' it, obsessed by it is another thing. It would be nice if races were called on their merits and not by the betting.
can't stand hoiles. just sounds so smug with that syrupy voice.
Jun 23, 2018 -- 5:16PM, Deltâ wrote:
May 16, 2018 -- 5:09PM, ratpack wrote:That a reference (not constant) to the favourite should be made is the only part of that which is true.Thank You. Most UK commentators seem to give far more than a reference unfortunately, as though every punter is just a favourite betting idiot. Pity commentators have been asked to reference favourites in the first place, a ridiculous directive.
Cheers
Thank You. Most UK commentators seem to give far more than a reference unfortunately, as though every punter is just a favourite betting idiot. Pity commentators have been asked to reference favourites in the first place, a ridiculous directive.
^ that line was posted by you on the original fred
and lewisham ranger has also posted his again too
^ that line was posted by you on the original fred
and lewisham ranger has also posted his again too
Jun 23, 2018 -- 5:23PM, Deltâ wrote:
head in hands man required ... >>
More like psychiatrist man
Good commentator - wish we'd lose all the clever clogs history stuff
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539