Elarqaam and Natalies Joy making sure bookmaker's don't go hungry.
Time boffins are probably on the cliff face. Who cares if it produced the best time in a million years at Goodwood in a nothing maiden if that's the result up in class?
He has had plenty of first time 2yo winners but how many have backed up? Presumably, we have to wait for the duck egg first?
Elarqaam and Natalies Joy making sure bookmaker's don't go hungry.Time boffins are probably on the cliff face. Who cares if it produced the best time in a million years at Goodwood in a nothing maiden if that's the result up in class?He has had plent
Was mainly due to the time boffins but the stable talked it up more than they do for most of their horses. I think they were led by the former. The going and trip different today whatever the figures.
Was mainly due to the time boffins but the stable talked it up more than they do for most of their horses. I think they were led by the former. The going and trip different today whatever the figures.
Pedigree would suggest that the trip shouldn't have been an issue but she wouldn't have won at six furlongs today. Plenty of horses have seemingly hit a wall this week but they weren't all 5/4 favourites.
Even Hugh Taylor tipped it.Pedigree would suggest that the trip shouldn't have been an issue but she wouldn't have won at six furlongs today. Plenty of horses have seemingly hit a wall this week but they weren't all 5/4 favourites.
Then you must take this into account in races where he has runners. It is all part of the rich tapestry of working out who is trying, whose money is down, which 2nd choice will beat the stables short priced first choice, who is only running for a low handicap mark etc etc.
Then you must take this into account in races where he has runners. It is all part of the rich tapestry of working out who is trying, whose money is down, which 2nd choice will beat the stables short priced first choice, who is only running for a low
Did you think the same when he was churning out 100 losers in a row at 0%? One of the most shocking stats of recent times although this was the only place (what a surprise) that it got a significant mention. A fair chunk of those 105 winners will be covered by punters losses on Elarqaam and Natalies Joy.
Did you think the same when he was churning out 100 losers in a row at 0%? One of the most shocking stats of recent times although this was the only place (what a surprise) that it got a significant mention. A fair chunk of those 105 winners will be