The chances of my ending up inside are remote, but I like to think that I would put my literary skills to good use in the service of my fellow inmates should such an eventuality ever occur.
Interesting thought, TheFear.The chances of my ending up inside are remote, but I like to think that I would put my literary skills to good use in the service of my fellow inmates should such an eventuality ever occur.
impossible123 says - "I'd not make further comments on this matter until the outcome of Deutsch's leave to appeal against the custodial sentence is known"
Why? It didn't stop you spouting fluent bo llocks about the case just 20 minutes ago.
impossible123 says - "I'd not make further comments on this matter until the outcome of Deutsch's leave to appeal against the custodial sentence is known"Why? It didn't stop you spouting fluent bo llocks about the case just 20 minutes ago.
Criminal Law Act 1967 1967 CHAPTER 58 An Act to amend the law of England and Wales by abolishing the division of crimes into felonies and misdemeanours and to amend and simplify the law in respect of matters arising from or related to that division or the abolition of it; to do away (within or without England and Wales) with certain obsolete crimes together with the torts of maintenance and champerty; and for purposes connected therewith.
[21st July 1967]
Part I Felony and Misdemeanour Annotations: Help about Annotation Extent Information
E1 Subject to s. 11(2)-(4) this Part shall not extend to Scotland or Northern Ireland see s. 11(1)
1 Abolition of distinction between felony and misdemeanour. (1)All distinctions between felony and misdemeanour are hereby abolished. 1 Abolition of distinction between felony and misdemeanour. (1)All distinctions between felony and misdemeanour are hereby abolished. (2)Subject to the provisions of this Act, on all matters on which a distinction has previously been made between felony and misdemeanour, including mode of trial, the law and practice in relation to all offences cognisable under the law of England and Wales (including piracy) shall be the law and practice applicable at the commencement of this Act in relation to misdemeanour.
Criminal Law Act 19671967 CHAPTER 58An Act to amend the law of England and Wales by abolishing the division of crimes into felonies and misdemeanours and to amend and simplify the law in respect of matters arising from or related to that division or
Willie - not sure anyone on here is being "sympathetic" to Deutsch. Not even sure the Williams letter is particularly sympathetic - she is not certainly not defending him.
Willie - not sure anyone on here is being "sympathetic" to Deutsch. Not even sure the Williams letter is particularly sympathetic - she is not certainly not defending him.
It is true that the felony/misdemeanour dichotomy was "officially" abolished in England and Wales.Although not in Scotland and, and the distinction still applies in the US.
Nonetheless, it is still a valid distinction to make, regardless of the judicial location, in order to differentiate between the gravity of a carefully premeditated crime (ala Piggott) and a spur-of-the moment piece of recklessness ( ala Deutsch)
It is true that the felony/misdemeanour dichotomy was "officially" abolished in England and Wales.Although not in Scotland and, and the distinction still applies in the US.Nonetheless, it is still a valid distinction to make, regardless of the judici
“It’s sad, it’s very sad,” said Twiston-Davies. “He’s a lovely lad and I think they’ve been very hard on him. We all make the odd mistake, but there we are.
TD should also be castigated for referring to this issue as a 'mistake'. If i type a word incorrectly in a post, that's a mistake. What CD did, can in no way be mentioned as a mistake, it was a reckless and criminal action, end of !
“It’s sad, it’s very sad,” said Twiston-Davies. “He’s a lovely lad and I think they’ve been very hard on him. We all make the odd mistake, but there we are.TD should also be castigated for referring to this issue as a 'mistake'. If i ty
"odd mistake" drastically underestimates what Deutsch did.
"fellow felon" compares his offence with that of Piggott. You were suggesting, admittedly with a flawed view of the law, that Deutsch's offence was less serious than that of Piggott.
Decko - Except that"odd mistake" drastically underestimates what Deutsch did. "fellow felon" compares his offence with that of Piggott. You were suggesting, admittedly with a flawed view of the law, that Deutsch's offence was less serious than that
decko,if he'd collided with another car and someone was killed or badly injured would you still be of the same opinion? yes piggott committed a crime but no ones life was ever going to be put in danger.
decko,if he'd collided with another car and someone was killed or badly injured would you still be of the same opinion?yes piggott committed a crime but no ones life was ever going to be put in danger.
Horse trainer admits 110mph drive Venetia Williams Venetia Williams was caught speeding near Evesham National Hunt trainer Venetia Williams has pleaded guilty to driving at 110mph in Worcestershire. Ms Williams, who trains about 70 horses at her base in How Caple, near Ross-on-Wye, Herefordshire, was caught on the Evesham bypass on 9 September.
She admitted breaking the 70mph speed limit, saying she had been rushing back to tend to a sick horse.
Worcester magistrates banned her from driving for 42 days and fined her £500. She was also ordered to pay £35 costs. The court heard she was spotted when she overtook an unmarked police car on the A46 at about 85mph.
The officers then followed her as she increased her speed to between 108mph and 110mph.
They also said she drove closely behind a Mazda, apparently trying to make it pull over out of her way.
Miss Williams' solicitor Mark Haslam said she was racing back to her yard to look after a horse, Luna, who had the potentially fatal colic.
He said her head lad, who was the only other person with a key to the medicine cabinet, was off and as it was a Sunday it was going to take some time to get a vet.
Mr Haslam told the court she needed a car to run her business and looked after her elderly father, who has Parkinson's Disease and lives five miles from her home.
Outside court, Ms Williams said: "Colic is potentially a very dangerous situation and it was vital that I got back to help the horse and fortunately the horse survived."
Horse trainer admits 110mph drive Venetia WilliamsVenetia Williams was caught speeding near EveshamNational Hunt trainer Venetia Williams has pleaded guilty to driving at 110mph in Worcestershire.Ms Williams, who trains about 70 horses at her base in
I knew she was not the posh, morally high standard, totty she appears to some
How dare you, sir. I demand satisfaction . A lady's honour is at stake. Pistols or swords, your choice.
Getting back to Deutsch, the two things I want to emphasise is that [A] he wasn't "drunk" and he didn't kill or hurt anybody.
You can say "well he [b]could have killed somebody" all you like, but the fact remains that he didn't. Hypothetical scenarios have no place in rational analysis.
Neither did he damage any property or cause physical harm to any living creature as a result of his escapade, and my submission is that this is because he was sober and demonstrated exemplary driving skills in a very stressful situation.
I knew she was not the posh, morally high standard, totty she appears to someHow dare you, sir. I demand satisfaction . A lady's honour is at stake. Pistols or swords, your choice.Getting back to Deutsch, the two things I want to emphasise is that [A
He wasn't "drunk" but he "pleaded guilty to dangerous driving while over the legal alcohol limit and escaping from police custody". Thanks for the clarification, Decko.
He wasn't "drunk" but he "pleaded guilty to dangerous driving while over the legal alcohol limit and escaping from police custody". Thanks for the clarification, Decko.
How dare you, sir. I demand satisfaction . A lady's honour is at stake. Pistols or swords, your choice.
How common, i insist we use sharpened Reindeer antlers.
How dare you, sir. I demand satisfaction . A lady's honour is at stake. Pistols or swords, your choice.How common, i insist we use sharpened Reindeer antlers.
Getting back to Deutsch, the two things I want to emphasise is that [A] he wasn't "drunk" and he didn't kill or hurt anybody.
Yes he was drunk - he was over the drink drive limit and is classed as intoxicated behind the wheel. His flee attempt and driving the wrong side of roads and around roundabouts is testimony to that. He also stunk of booze.
You can say "well he [b]could have killed somebody" all you like, but the fact remains that he didn't. Hypothetical scenarios have no place in rational analysis.
More complete bollox from your feeble attempts at justifying a heinous crime. If I pointed a loaded gun and shot at you but missed; would you be happy if the coppers reported that they couldn't prosecute me for attempted murder as the fact remains that he didn't murder you.
Getting back to Deutsch, the two things I want to emphasise is that [A] he wasn't "drunk" and he didn't kill or hurt anybody.Yes he was drunk - he was over the drink drive limit and is classed as intoxicated behind the wheel. His flee attempt and dri
slightly over the limit and panicked.drunk drivers dont get locked up when twice,three or even four times the limit.
forum kangaroo court again,holier than though.
slightly over the limit and panicked.drunk drivers dont get locked up when twice,three or even four times the limit.forum kangaroo court again,holier than though.
chavman - have you read anything about the case? The sentence had somewhat less to do with his intoxication, than his conduct behind the wheel having escaped potential arrest. 114mph, wrong way round a roundabout, wrong side of the road, 5 mile car chase ending with a stinger to stop him, innocent parties in the vehicle.
Not sure anyone on here is making any judgement over and above that reached by the court.
chavman - have you read anything about the case? The sentence had somewhat less to do with his intoxication, than his conduct behind the wheel having escaped potential arrest. 114mph, wrong way round a roundabout, wrong side of the road, 5 mile car
youve now got the forum attempting to be judge and jury on conjecture of hard fact of the breathalyser.top it all they wanna pass judgement on the punishment their skewed morals deem fair.
you couldnt make it up
youve now got the forum attempting to be judge and jury on conjecture of hard fact of the breathalyser.top it all they wanna pass judgement on the punishment their skewed morals deem fair.you couldnt make it up
The policeman said he stank of booze as he was going to give him a verbal warning for speeding!
Unfortunately, rather than face up to his actions and accept the consequences he decided to endager the lives of his passengers (who were screaming at him to stop), the policeman (whose arm was in the vehicle) and innocent members of the public using the public roads.
When you are driving in the dark with no headlights, reaching speeds of 114mph and driving on the wrong side of the road and round a roundabout then you are playing russian roulette with innocent peoples lives simply because you aren't man enough to face the consequences of your actions.
So please stop trying to downplay this as some form of high jinx; as you are defending the indefensible.
The policeman said he stank of booze as he was going to give him a verbal warning for speeding! Unfortunately, rather than face up to his actions and accept the consequences he decided to endager the lives of his passengers (who were screaming at him
If only that were the case, Cork. You can be dim sometimes, for an intelligent and very well informed chap. Read his last three or four posts on this for guidance.
If only that were the case, Cork. You can be dim sometimes, for an intelligent and very well informed chap. Read his last three or four posts on this for guidance.
There is one aspect of this case which I am going to bring up again, because it seemed iffy to me right from the git-go.
Why did the cop pull the car over in the first place ?
The second-hand (or more like fifth hand) info in the tabloids says that the cop "wanted to warn him about his speed". I would dearly love to know the exact circs of this. Was the cop following him, and therefore knew that Deutsch was speeding ? And if so, how far over the speed limit was he traveling ? Or did he do some kind of radar gun check ? Extremely unlikely IMO. And why didn't he issue a speeding ticket there and then ? Or even subsequently, added to the other charges.
Nope ... it was an opportunistic borderline-legal pull over ... that was what so frustrated Deutsch IMO.
There is one aspect of this case which I am going to bring up again, because it seemed iffy to me right from the git-go.Why did the cop pull the car over in the first place ?The second-hand (or more like fifth hand) info in the tabloids says that the
I stand by my word blackbarn, has form for it and you are all performing exactly how he wants, hence the post above, you need to relax and stand back and you will see he is taking the rise out of you because you are biting, but then I'm dim so dont't take my word, feel free to keep fueling it up for Art to enjoy
I stand by my word blackbarn, has form for it and you are all performing exactly how he wants, hence the post above, you need to relax and stand back and you will see he is taking the rise out of you because you are biting, but then I'm dim so dont't
Don't be such a **** Art. He was pulled over as he was speeding. Copper smelt his boozy breath and he he failed a roadside test. Then he fled and endagered lives.
Please stop trying to create an excuse for his behaviousr where none exists. I would like to know what your opinion of him would have been if he ploughed into one of your loved ones. Would you blame he policeman (for doing his job and keeping drink drivers off the roads) then?
Don't be such a **** Art. He was pulled over as he was speeding. Copper smelt his boozy breath and he he failed a roadside test. Then he fled and endagered lives.Please stop trying to create an excuse for his behaviousr where none exists. I would lik
There is an irony in laymen like Struthers and Twiston-Davies criticizing the sentence (and by implication the criminal justice system and the judge). They are professionals in an industry that struggles to accept criticism from anybody perceived to be an outsider.
The desire of his friends and colleagues to defend and support Deutsch is understandable but that does n't necessarily have to extend to questioning the severity of his punishment.I'm not sure what purpose is served by publishing the letter Venetia Williams sent to her owners (other than allowing the Racing Post to continue to generate column inches and social media traffic from this story).
I don't think the sentence was harsh but he is only 21 and deserves a shot at redemption - once he has served his time.
There is an irony in laymen like Struthers and Twiston-Davies criticizing the sentence (and by implication the criminal justice system and the judge). They are professionals in an industry that struggles to accept criticism from anybody perceived to
It just so happens that a very good contact in Middleham has advised me to have a decent bet on DESERT LANTERN tomorrow. I don't back debutants so it won't be carrying any of my money, but ....
Got any winners for tomorrow deckers?It just so happens that a very good contact in Middleham has advised me to have a decent bet on DESERT LANTERN tomorrow. I don't back debutants so it won't be carrying any of my money, but ....
FFS chav h committed a criminal act. An extremely dangerous act. By the law of the land he got (and absolutely deserved) jail.
We can' have drunk racers with no regard for public safety walking free. What sort of message would that send out?
FFS chav h committed a criminal act. An extremely dangerous act. By the law of the land he got (and absolutely deserved) jail.We can' have drunk racers with no regard for public safety walking free. What sort of message would that send out?
whilst going the wrong way round the roundabout, 'if he hit a car head on and killed people' how many on here would say life would be a fair sentence?
im going 97.8%.
ok a 'hypothetical' scenario...whilst going the wrong way round the roundabout, 'if he hit a car head on and killed people' how many on here would say life would be a fair sentence?im going 97.8%.
Art Decko 19 May 18 23:04 How many times does it have to be reiterated that Deutsch wasn't "drunk" ?
you dont have to be rolling around ydc..its been proven without doubt that small intakes of alcohol impairs your driving ability..are you really this naive?
Art Decko 19 May 18 23:04 How many times does it have to be reiterated that Deutsch wasn't "drunk" ?you dont have to be rolling around ydc..its been proven without doubt that small intakes of alcohol impairs your driving ability..are you really t
chavman 19 May 18 23:11 in the greater scheme of things do you think it warranted custodial willie
I certainly aint gona claim ive been an honest law abiding citizen becos i havent,but,ive got respect for the police,always have,without them the country would be lawless,i dont like drink drivers never have and always thought the law should be tougher on them,1st time caught 5yr ban,2nd automatic jail,sentence depending on circumstances.For deutsch to drive over the limit was reckless itself.to then jump back in his car to create a police chase that oh so easily 'could' have resulted in serious injury to both people in his car and other motorists is simply indefensible,i'd say 10mths is fair bearing in mind he'll only serve 5.
chavman 19 May 18 23:11 in the greater scheme of things do you think it warranted custodial willieI certainly aint gona claim ive been an honest law abiding citizen becos i havent,but,ive got respect for the police,always have,without them the co
One of the problems here is that there is a total lack of relevant information about the details of what actually happened.
I have already highlighted the iffiness of the validity of the stop in the first place.
The whole "cop smashing window and getting arm trapped while dropping radio" is another total mystery. No details whatsoever ... did the cop get dragged hundreds of yards along the carriageway, Hollywood style, or what ? We don't know.
But for me, at this moment in time, the most disturbing aspect of the whole issue is that there have been no verified first hand reports or interviews with the other occupants of the car. Why is this ? What are the cops afraid of? Have the other occupants been instructed to say nothing ?
One of the problems here is that there is a total lack of relevant information about the details of what actually happened. I have already highlighted the iffiness of the validity of the stop in the first place.The whole "cop smashing window and gett
for the firearm offence did they sentence you on the pretext you were seconds away from using it,or the criminal act of having it
You realise one of the main reasons he got sentenced to police custody is for escaping police custody?
for the firearm offence did they sentence you on the pretext you were seconds away from using it,or the criminal act of having it You realise one of the main reasons he got sentenced to police custody is for escaping police custody?
i was caught with a firearm in the days when it wasnt such a big deal,the law re firearms has been altered radically over the last 10yrs,its now a 5yr sentence for being in possession of a firearm or ammunition,i was prosecuted having having a firearm without a certificate,it was found in a garage hidden away,if i was caught with it in my waistband on the high st then thats a different matter.
i was caught with a firearm in the days when it wasnt such a big deal,the law re firearms has been altered radically over the last 10yrs,its now a 5yr sentence for being in possession of a firearm or ammunition,i was prosecuted having having a firear
what most dont realise re this is..precedents have to be set. if deutsch had been let off with a fine for eg..doesnt that then give every drink drive the opportunity to think,'oh hang on,i mays well try to escape from the police in my car as if i do get caught i'll only get a fine'..it was very stupid and without a doubt reckless,no complaints.
what most dont realise re this is..precedents have to be set.if deutsch had been let off with a fine for eg..doesnt that then give every drink drive the opportunity to think,'oh hang on,i mays well try to escape from the police in my car as if i do g
whilst going the wrong way round the roundabout, 'if he hit a car head on and killed people' how many on here would say life would be a fair sentence?
im going 97.8%.
i'll reiterate.. a 'hypothetical' scenario...whilst going the wrong way round the roundabout, 'if he hit a car head on and killed people' how many on here would say life would be a fair sentence?im going 97.8%.