They must feel that the paper was already at a level where the people still prepared to keep buying it wouldn't be that bothered about another price hike and that sticking the cost up won't lose them money.
They must feel that the paper was already at a level where the people still prepared to keep buying it wouldn't be that bothered about another price hike and that sticking the cost up won't lose them money.
Surely that horse didn't cost much anyway. Has one of the worst pedigrees of any horse in training. I don't rate Lydia Richards but no trainer could win with that.
Surely that horse didn't cost much anyway. Has one of the worst pedigrees of any horse in training. I don't rate Lydia Richards but no trainer could win with that.
I'm sure that the tedious Steve Dennis could write a worthwhile article investigating the extortionate price we have to pay for reading his boring sht!
I'm sure that the tedious Steve Dennis could write a worthwhile article investigating the extortionate price we have to pay for reading his boring sht!
just looking at the horse in the paddock you could see it would probably be useless and 1 of the owners said it would be a good handicapper in 2 years time.
good luck with that project.
just looking at the horse in the paddock you could see it would probably be useless and 1 of the owners said it would be a good handicapper in 2 years time.good luck with that project.
First foal; dam remote third from two starts in points
PU Sunset Skye 66/1 Andrew Glassonbury Lydia Richards 5-10-8 – – – – Always last, not fluent, struggling 3rd, weakened 7th, tailed off when pulled up after 3 out
Home-bred Breeder Nick WattsFirst foal; dam remote third from two starts in points PU Sunset Skye 66/1Andrew Glassonbury Lydia Richards 5-10-8 – – – – Always last, not fluent, struggling 3rd, weakened 7th, tailed off
If it was £2 a day and £2.50 Sat i'd buy it. Not bought it since it went up to £3. and don't miss it, i only bought it for pricewise, now they don't hold the prices anymore, there's no point for me.
If it was £2 a day and £2.50 Sat i'd buy it.Not bought it since it went up to £3. and don't miss it, i only bought it for pricewise, now they don't hold the prices anymore, there's no point for me.
It’s a fair price given the info involved, They’re the wisden of racing,somebody has to collate,store and produce the results history.
Anybody buying it does so for a specific reason,a card at a track that day,dog cards,breeding operations,etc etc.
It needs to service such a large breadth of information,hence the cost.
It seems expensive if you just want the card and form for 1 track that day.but what’s the alternative.
Maybe tracks could sell 4-5 page pamphlets printed off that morning from the post of just that days card,virtually no cost yet has all the info that days crowd want.
Once customers knew they could buy these day of the race post info. They buy race cards for 3 quid and these are useless really.
A post racecard lifted from that days edition would sell well for 2 quid.if it was packaged .
It is a nightmare trying to look at the card from an 80page newspaper.
It’s a fair price given the info involved,They’re the wisden of racing,somebody has to collate,store and produce the results history.Anybody buying it does so for a specific reason,a card at a track that day,dog cards,breeding operations,etc etc.
The men on the spot tipster that they employ have let me down so many times i dont even buy it on a Saturday anymore.The Newmarket and Lambourn guys continually tipping the wrong horse did it for me.
The men on the spot tipster that they employ have let me down so many times i dont even buy it on a Saturday anymore.The Newmarket and Lambourn guys continually tipping the wrong horse did it for me.
Been looking at a few of front covers recently - looks like another 'cheerleading' activity - pics of the Osbourne's celebrating as if they are just a 'lovely family' on the front cover...let's not mention 100s of their other 'efforts' in races of course...
Been looking at a few of front covers recently - looks like another 'cheerleading' activity - pics of the Osbourne's celebrating as if they are just a 'lovely family' on the front cover...let's not mention 100s of their other 'efforts' in races of co