There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
No chance, whatsoever, unless you are out of the horrendous 'Kick-Back'
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 14
|
By:
Some of those horses hated it, looked cruel to me.
|
|
By:
yes the attrition rate on dirt is higher than any other surface
its also massively rail biased (to front running speed) |
|
By:
sheik hamdan a lot to answer for.
|
|
By:
The layout was much better before the redevelopment
|
|
By:
nad al sheba was better
|
|
By:
^ correct - Nad Al Sheba definitely a better, and fairer, track.
Meydan being just a big HOTEL complex and 'show-off Palace' for the Sheikhs. NEVER a proper Racecourse in the memory of man - - even many Turf races can be an embarrassment aswell. ----- The change to DIRT being just to attract the AMERICANS for merely ONE race per year Even the change to Tapeta did not work - mind you, has THAT worked at Newcastle, too? - there also appears to be something wrong with the LAY-OUT at Meydan, though... Makes Chester look more like Pontefract. |
|
By:
Should put Fibresand down.
|
|
By:
Now you are taking the p!ss
|
|
By:
Nad el Sheba amd Meydan are the same fecking place
|
|
By:
that was a good race to be fair/ dont like dirt though
|
|
By:
ooked cruel to me.
|
|
By:
Still wearing covvid visors 2
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
You can see that when they designed Nad Al Sheba they put a lot of thought into the design and then worked hard at building up the quality of the races.
Meydan was just a cash grab ie just maybe a bigger more grander race track and then switch to Tapeta to appease the AR lobby. |