Exactly. An utter disgrace of a ride. Gave away lengths at the start, deliberately, with no intention of ever putting the horse into the race. The stewards need to call him in , amongst others!!
Exactly. An utter disgrace of a ride. Gave away lengths at the start, deliberately, with no intention of ever putting the horse into the race. The stewards need to call him in , amongst others!!
I have only just watched this back. Would have flagged it up myself.
A blatant case of schooling in public. Beaten after a hundred yards (gave away an easy dozen lengths to the other three at the head of the market) and never placed to challenge. Did they enter the horse in the wrong novice hurdle as he was ridden as if there was another half a mile?
Horse should be banned and trainer and jockey should receive considerable fines. Punters basically cheated.
How much were the fines?
I have only just watched this back. Would have flagged it up myself.A blatant case of schooling in public. Beaten after a hundred yards (gave away an easy dozen lengths to the other three at the head of the market) and never placed to challenge. Did
I was at Chepstow yesterday. Believe me it was worse watching live than on TV (seen the replay now) as parts of the "race" so far as KM were concerned were out of camera shot. I said to someone next to me that it wasn't off as early as turning away from the stands.
Did ATR say ANYTHING?
s
I was at Chepstow yesterday. Believe me it was worse watching live than on TV (seen the replay now) as parts of the "race" so far as KM were concerned were out of camera shot. I said to someone next to me that it wasn't off as early as turning away f
I'm not sure PP. I blame the media to some extent - I've heard Hoiles and D Fitzgerald talk about "that horse finished too close up and might have ruined his mark". Dreadful, clever dick comments.
I'm not sure PP. I blame the media to some extent - I've heard Hoiles and D Fitzgerald talk about "that horse finished too close up and might have ruined his mark". Dreadful, clever dick comments.
iv'e been watching this with h'caps in mind, they used 1 life up the time before at chepstow when josh moore rode and given a very easy time.
a winning pointer you would have thought 2m would be too short anyway,blatant yesterday pushing their luck trying to get away with that.
even our stewards are not that blind.
i didn't hear anything on atr.
iv'e been watching this with h'caps in mind, they used 1 life up the time before at chepstow when josh moore rode and given a very easy time.a winning pointer you would have thought 2m would be too short anyway,blatant yesterday pushing their luck tr
Just watched absolutely incredible that there isn't anything more severe coming out of this,the likes of Jim Best must be fuming Moore even did the old 'nodding head' looking up and down like he was trying so hard that he had to keep checking he was going in the right direction.That's as blatant as I've seen for a while deserves far bigger punishments all round,mid race was funny when he didn't move despite being 25l+ behind the 3rd horse
Just watched absolutely incredible that there isn't anything more severe coming out of this,the likes of Jim Best must be fuming Moore even did the old 'nodding head' looking up and down like he was trying so hard that he had to keep checking he was
Just watched the Luck interview with Miss Lee apropos this.
Refused to discuss. Fine. That's her right. In response RUK/Luck et al should decline to allow her the oxygen of publicity on her good days. They won't of course.
Just watched the Luck interview with Miss Lee apropos this.Refused to discuss. Fine. That's her right. In response RUK/Luck et al should decline to allow her the oxygen of publicity on her good days. They won't of course.
Is that online Paris - I couldn't see it last night? If she refused to discuss because she might appeal that would be fair enough but any other reason would be a joke from someone who loves publicity!
Is that online Paris - I couldn't see it last night? If she refused to discuss because she might appeal that would be fair enough but any other reason would be a joke from someone who loves publicity!
I went to Chepstow yesterday The Fear and watched it on the live coverage I had recorded from Ludlow. She wouldn't even say whether or not an appeal was planned, so I surmise not. Luck didn't press the matter - I don't blame him as there was no way she was going to react - but really any media outlet should not be permitting interviewees to conduct matters purely on their own terms. Hence my suggestion.
0% chance of it happening.
I went to Chepstow yesterday The Fear and watched it on the live coverage I had recorded from Ludlow. She wouldn't even say whether or not an appeal was planned, so I surmise not. Luck didn't press the matter - I don't blame him as there was no way s
If she wasn't going to discuss then pointless putting herself up for interview. Who wants to hear about a 1/20 shot?
As I said earlier there are no grounds for Appeal. I don't think Moore's suggestion that he saved the horse from bleeding would carry any weight. Clearly if the horse is so fragile he can't be competitive then he shouldn't be on a racecourse.
If she wasn't going to discuss then pointless putting herself up for interview. Who wants to hear about a 1/20 shot?As I said earlier there are no grounds for Appeal. I don't think Moore's suggestion that he saved the horse from bleeding would carry
Not one of them ever will admit it, would be so funny if one of them stated, yes, not off today, waiting for another day and to have it right off, the day that happens is the day we have a racing paper that is in favour of the punters and asks relevant questions
Not one of them ever will admit it, would be so funny if one of them stated, yes, not off today, waiting for another day and to have it right off, the day that happens is the day we have a racing paper that is in favour of the punters and asks releva
They obviously think they're untouchable because that was truly shocking,if he thought the horse was going to bleed he should've pulled it up imo then people can accept there was something amiss.
They obviously think they're untouchable because that was truly shocking,if he thought the horse was going to bleed he should've pulled it up imo then people can accept there was something amiss.
I've just thought why are they running expectant bleeders especially un-medicated anyway. They should be trying to obtain the best possible position not potentially protecting a bleeder,that might sound harsh but people are betting on the outcome
I've just thought why are they running expectant bleeders especially un-medicated anyway.They should be trying to obtain the best possible position not potentially protecting a bleeder,that might sound harsh but people are betting on the outcome