Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
howard
24 Feb 18 19:51
Joined:
Date Joined: 09 Mar 03
| Topic/replies: 17,012 | Blogger: howard's blog
must be void surely

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 31
By:
dumplingheid
When: 24 Feb 18 19:52
Exactly the same happened not so long ago and the race was ok and the result stood.
By:
howard
When: 24 Feb 18 19:53
I bet it wasn't exactly the same timing that was badly left
By:
Big Boss
When: 24 Feb 18 19:56
only decent winner I've had all day after losing in about 3 photo finishes, bound to be void Laugh
By:
dumplingheid
When: 24 Feb 18 19:56
I'm trying to get the race it was over 2 seconds later in opening and the field were twice the distance in front as this race
By:
dumplingheid
When: 24 Feb 18 19:57
they have stated weigh in at the track
By:
sparrow
When: 24 Feb 18 19:57
Can't believe how quiet it is on here after that. At one time there would have been at least 50 posts.
By:
howard
When: 24 Feb 18 20:00
That may be because they haven't seen it. Think the trainer will be bringing it up later. Laugh What if this was a fav in the Nunthorpe ? You see it's nowt to do with the horse.
By:
geoff m
When: 24 Feb 18 20:03
Surely there are official rules regarding this situation. Altho aint a clue what they are!!
By:
dumplingheid
When: 24 Feb 18 20:08
https://www.sportinglife.com/racing/fast-results
By:
dumplingheid
When: 24 Feb 18 20:08
https://www.sportinglife.com/racing/fast-results
By:
howard
When: 24 Feb 18 20:08
The race should be void but if it isn't then yes there should be money back on the horse but it sounds like nothing has happened as regards betting which is crazy. Why didn't the starter declare a false start ?
By:
Big Boss
When: 24 Feb 18 20:09
cos flag didn't go up for false start, I think it will be result stands
By:
dumplingheid
When: 24 Feb 18 20:10
I know that after the weigh in the result cannot be altered.
By:
howard
When: 24 Feb 18 20:27
BB, that's correct  someone will get the blame but they never get the sack.
By:
number 7
When: 24 Feb 18 20:30
It looks like its not a problem, head start result stands
By:
Willie Shafter.
When: 24 Feb 18 21:16
what happened?
By:
howard
When: 24 Feb 18 21:23
one stall opened VERY late horse finished third. everything tickety boo.
By:
Willie Shafter.
When: 24 Feb 18 22:26
well if they deem the horse to have caused it then nowt to ponder over.
By:
sparrow
When: 25 Feb 18 07:03
Race 5 - 7:45pm
THE 32Red CASINO HANDICAP STAKES (CLASS 4)

An enquiry was held into the faulty action of the starting stalls in this race. William Cox, the rider of CARP KID (IRE), placed third, the trainer John Flint and the Starter were interviewed and shown recordings of the incident. It was found that there had been a fault with stall 5 resulting in it opening fractionally after the other stalls. Being satisfied that the malfunction had not materially prejudiced a sufficient number of runners and that the starting procedures had been properly carried out, no further action was taken but a report was forwarded to the Head Office of the British Horseracing Authorit
By:
lcredd
When: 25 Feb 18 08:47
I didn't see it but that does not sound right. The gates surely have to open at the same time. If that was the Derby and the favourite was affected then there would be outrage. It should be the same for all races. Void race or deem the horse a non-runner.
By:
howard
When: 25 Feb 18 10:48
wazza the horse was perfectly still and didn't cause it. Therefore it was nothing to do with the horse or the jockey. If one of them is to blame then of course you have to take it but this was an equipment failure.
By:
howard
When: 25 Feb 18 10:53
" ...the malfunction had not materially prejudiced a sufficient number of runners"  So in future everything is fine as long as only one horse has been left in the stalls ?
By:
howard
When: 25 Feb 18 11:02
It's entirely possible that the horse could have finished 2nd rather than 3rd.  So betting winnings/losses involved as well as stakes.
By:
roggrain
When: 25 Feb 18 13:29
Begs the question doesn't it Howard, what is a 'sufficient number of runners'?
By:
roggrain
When: 25 Feb 18 13:29
Begs the question doesn't it Howard, what is a 'sufficient number of runners'?
By:
equine flew
When: 25 Feb 18 13:32
Flint added: "I was told the rule is that 33 per cent of the horses have to be inconvenienced to have voided the race. But this needs to be looked at.
By:
roggrain
When: 25 Feb 18 13:35
Best way to deal with this kind of thing would be to let the result stand for prize money but void all bets.
By:
Willie Shafter.
When: 25 Feb 18 13:50
aye very strange..its cost it about 2L but they say no harm done..as been said it was derby and the fav they'd be uproar.
By:
howard
When: 25 Feb 18 13:55
Yes you have to void all bets because these days it's layers as well as backers that could be s hafted. Imagine if an even money fav gets left in the Nunthorpe. Then layers could have big liabilities on the winner if the fav is beaten. Just cos it's a small race at Wolves should be same rules everywhere.
By:
howard
When: 25 Feb 18 13:58
Pity it didn't happen in Lingers listed 5f race yesterdayDevil
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 25 Feb 24 15:16
void
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com