stewards Chelms

1000 Paddy A.  good luck with that one ...

revised

winner disq...

beggars belief

oops

costly wullie ?

wtf

On the head on it looked like the runner up lost its back legs for a stride, but right on the line?

Willie you've had a shocker

domino effect, good decision

Deltâ    15 Feb 18 18:16 
Willie you've had a shocker

if anyone posts a lay of teds brother at 1.03 i'll agree.

willie correct. will get it back on appeal

bugger. ive backed the winner and bailed out in enquiry.

Worst decision i've ever seen. Runner up moved off a straight line much more than the winner.

Back (Bet For)    Odds    Stake    Profit
Paddy A2.52 £5.00  £7.60
Teds Brother1.12 £700.00  £86.67
£705.00
Lay (Bet Against)    Backer's
odds    Backer's
stake   
Payout
Liability
Paddy A2.48 £5.08  £7.52
Teds Brother1.04 £700.00  £26.00

They Don't Pay-Out on, "appeal," though.

1.01    £2,850               
1.02            £28,089       
1.03            £65,699       
1.04            £56,699       
1.05            £34,625       
1.06            £5,879       
1.07            £2,228       
1.08            £3,616       
1.09            £2,713       
1.1        £22    £11,530       
1.11            £8,178       
1.12            £6,981       
1.13            £2,785       
1.14            £2,246       
1.15        £86    £3,821       
1.16            £1,271       
1.17            £409       
1.18            £3,268       
1.19            £6,798       
1.2            £4,828

been worse decisions than that imo. Margin was only  nose. Winner bumped paddy and paddy then bumped the second. Always a small chance it could be reversed

Theses fellas really are a law unto themselves

Selection     Odds     Stake(£)     Bid type     Placed     Profit/loss(£)
Paddy A     2.52     5.00     Back     15-Feb-18 17:52     -5.00
Paddy A     2.52     5.00     Lay     15-Feb-18 17:57     5.00
Tagur     6.15     23.88     Back     15-Feb-18 18:00     123.02
Tagur     7.32     100.00     Back     15-Feb-18 18:01     632.19
Tagur     6.00     0.06     Back     15-Feb-18 18:00     0.30
Tagur     8.40     100.00     Back     15-Feb-18 18:00     740.00
Tagur     11.51     100.00     Back     15-Feb-18 18:01     1,051.11
Tagur     11.50     100.00     Back     15-Feb-18 18:01     1,050.00
Tagur     11.50     100.00     Back     15-Feb-18 18:01     1,050.00
Tagur     11.50     100.00     Back     15-Feb-18 18:01     1,050.00
Tagur     11.50     100.00     Back     15-Feb-18 18:01     1,050.00
Teds Brother     1.05     1,000.00     Lay     15-Feb-18 18:02     1,000.00
Teds Brother     1.04     1,000.00     Lay     15-Feb-18 18:02     1,000.00
*Average odds: On Off     Back subtotal:     6,741.62
Lay subtotal:     2,005.00
Market subtotal:     8,746.62
Commission @ 2.5%:     218.67
Net Market Total:     8,527.95

Runner up was the one who bumped Paddy surely?

ultimate free money disaster and willie still wins, got the game by the nuts that fella ....

thought the runner up came across first (imo that should have been taken into consideration) but late bump by the winner i thought. Runner up looked unbalanced nr line

ming chopping it off again

i'd had £700 on in photo...thought no chance of a reversal but ive seen way too many bad decisions to start crashing in at 1.03..it went on that long i was getting twitchy and could green up for £64...thought not worth the sweat for another £18.
for once it went in my favour..still a shocking decision imo.

who laid the 1.03 anyone?

Runner up gave Paddy 2 or 3 bumps

the winner gives Paddy one bump

either kick both out or result stands.

Lets have central stewards, this nervous idiot talking now live on TV (Tony McGlone) just mumbled, put no plausible reason to justify the disqualification, if this logic was applied to all races, they would be getting thrown out left, right and centre....   IDIOT

I did the same as you Willie....in @ 1.15 in photo ...took my stake out @ 1.04......can't trust stewards

mcglone wasnt very convincing aye

mcglone came across as slightly embarrassing..

mr wong got lucky in the photo

Shocking decision, too much doubt to reverse. Doubt there would have been any complaints if the result had stood. Obviously the Chelmsford stewards like to play God, another example of why centralised stewarding is required. Millions of pounds at stake and jokers like these deciding where it goes.

the poster puts up free money nothing to see the horse gets thrown out but he still wins money ok

McGlone's got form for this, he looked very embarrassed after they chucked one out at Nottingham a few months back ...

hulk WD gray    Horse given the race murders the third and gets race. Be very surprised if this isn't changed again.

cos im the daddy doc..

Happy Chinese New Year to Mr Hunt

was 40 in stewards wonka ydc

7 posts in 15 years

well done lucky

I laid 1.02 and 1.05, still lost £8 on the race though. Poor decision in my view, but always best not to get heavily involved when it's only a nose as the winning distance seems to be the main factor for these clueless clowns.

yep of the kindergarten willie

i was just in a weird dream thought i was in a betting shop many years ago when this old boy use to say i am betting trap 5 here then when trap 4 won the race he then used to say i changed my mind going to the counter and bet the winner

That stewart chucked another one out a little while ago that was a sertantee to keep it.....

dr atkins


someone who admitted losing 100k on a race isnt going to lie over a few hundred............surely!!!1!!

it's not about the money just don't post free money and then come back and say i won on the race makes you look liar

An enquiry was held to consider the placings in this race after interference on the run to the line between the winner, TED’S BROTHER (IRE), ridden by Miss A. Peck, TAGUR (IRE), placed second and ridden by Miss H. T. Lees, and PADDY A (IRE), placed third and ridden by Mr S. Walker. The Stewards considered that the interference had improved TED’S BROTHER (IRE)’s placing as TAGUR (IRE) was bumped and had its hindquarters turned and the ground and momentum lost was deemed to be more than the official winning distance of a nose. However, it was considered that the interference had not affected PADDY A (IRE)’s placing. The placings were revised as follows: First – TAGUR (IRE); Second – TED’S BROTHER (IRE); Third – PADDY A (IRE). Miss. A. Peck was cautioned for careless riding as she allowed her mount to drift slightly left causing PADDY A (IRE) to be checked, which in turn bumped and slightly turned the hindquarters of TAGUR (IRE).

Tagur had pushed Paddy into Ted's in the first place. So in future it's OK if you push a third horse halfway across the track into a first past the post but because of that you then get slight interference yourself you get the race ?

Willie Shafter. 15 Feb 18 18:25

who laid the 1.03 anyone?

Did, but only because I'd heavily laid the second (since the winner), and wanted to cover the loss, didn't think for a moment really it would come in as a lay on the FPP, still crazy decision.

slightly confused .. does this mean you trade out of all the free munny freds you start ?  leaving all your loyal followers up **** creek when it gets reversed

no hulk never...i risk sometimes £20,000 in photos and inquirys...but this game is so hard now and after spending all day winning £600 and having £700 on in the photo i didnt think for 1 min it would get chucked...as stated it went on and on and i was amazed it hadnt drifted...offered me a £64 green up so rather than end up losing if the worst happened i took it and ran.

simply fluked up.

so basically...no-one laid this 1.03 apart from those greening up?

Feb 15, 2018 -- 8:58PM, Willie Shafter. wrote:

so basically...no-one laid this 1.03 apart from those greening up?

1.08 early doors when the market opened, was speculative, and not big stakes. once i'd seen the head on i regretted it tbh but it had come in so much by then that it wasn't worth taking the red.

yes..so everyone bar greener upperers didnt lay it.