There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
22 Dec 17
13:46
Joined:
Date Joined:
15 Jul 04
winner leaning on 2nd
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 21
|
By:
half a length
winner always holding the 2nd |
|
By:
hughes off the bridle is game over, weak as a kitten
|
|
By:
three quarters actually
|
|
By:
what ya think willie
|
|
By:
Free Monee texted willie
|
|
By:
Winner looks a very big price, no?
|
|
By:
aint seen hd on
 |
|
By:
stands
|
|
By:
obvious stewards and ruk oblivious. what price was it i could have reduced my lay :(
|
|
By:
well done willy, free money
|
|
By:
1.4 to keep
|
|
By:
The price to stand was crazy (hindsight etc) didn't get involved so no after timing, the price being so big
looked dangerous. Shouldn't think like that but hard not to in stewards |
|
By:
james ,if that was US racing deffo chucked out , here you have to knock them over for a diss.
|
|
By:
2 significant bumps & prolonged carrying from the last
neck or less probably goes but winner was snugly holding at the finish |
|
By:
thanks willie.
|
|
By:
Scout angle shows should've been reversed!
|
|
By:
interference was pretty bad.
|
|
By:
They type where they always seem to keep it but shouldn't. Jockey was happy to keep interfering with the 2nd and any benefit of the doubt in those circumstances should go to the horse that's been interfered with.
|
|
By:
Don't agree with that. It's nearly always better for punters that the a horse that's by far the best keeps the race. The other would never have won bumps or not.
|
|
By:
Howard, i would agree in cases where a horse is by far the best. That one didn't look the case to me and i was on the winner. Consistent interference from the last to the line and only 3/4 of a length so a tough one to call. Therefore rules should be changed in favour of the one who adhered to the rules.
|
|
By:
it gained 3/4L due to the 2nd bump
|