JUST A FEW FACTS REGARDING ONCOURSE BOOKMAKERS PAYING IN ADVANCE TO WORK,CHELTENHAM /AINTREE ARE TRYING TO IMPLEMENT COMPULSORY PAYMENT IN ADVANCE FOR ONCOURSE BOOKMAKERS WHICH IS ALL WELL AND GOOD IF THATS WHAT YOU PERSONALLY WANT, BUT AS WAS BROUGHT UP AT THE CHELTENHAM BOOKMAKERS MEETING THIS IS NOT AND I STRESS NOT COMPULSORY, YOU CAN PAY ON THE DAY TO STAND AND THERE IS NOTHING IN OUR CONTRACTS THAT STATES OTHERWISE. THIS YEAR SOME BOOKMAKERS AT THE GOODWOOD FESTIVAL WHO HAD PAYED IN ADVANCE DECIDED NOT TO STAND DUE TO THE INCLEMENT WEATHER,THEY WERE REFUNDED ZERO,PAY IN ADVANCE AT YOUR OWN PERIL,ONCE A PRESIDENT IS SET FOR PAYMENT IN ADVANCE I THINK WE ALL KNOW WHERE IT WILL LEAD, OUR USELESS ASSOCIATIONS SEEM TO BE OBLIVIOUS!
DAVY = AND SO IS CASH > BETTER TO PROMOTE IT (ONCOURSE, CASH ACCOUNTS FOR 99% OF BUSINESS) THAN ADD ANOTHER NAIL TO THE COFFIN,ITS A BIT LIKE THE BETFAIR CHASE AT HAYDOCK ON SATURDAY,ALL THE FRONT LINE COMMISSION AGENTS WILL BE PROUDLY WEARING THE FREE YELLOW SCARFS,GOT TO BE SEEN TO BE BELIEVED
DAVY = AND SO IS CASH > BETTER TO PROMOTE IT (ONCOURSE, CASH ACCOUNTS FOR 99% OF BUSINESS) THAN ADD ANOTHER NAIL TO THE COFFIN,ITS A BIT LIKE THE BETFAIR CHASE AT HAYDOCK ON SATURDAY,ALL THE FRONT LINE COMMISSION AGENTS WILL BE PROUDLY WEARING THE F
HALCYON,100% NO CHANCE OF ME PAYING UPFRONT,ALREADY SEEN MY SOLICITOR OVER THIS MATTER AND I HAVE BEEN ASSURED THEY WOULD FIGHT MY CASE ON A NO WIN NO FEE BASIS IF IT CAME TO COURT,UNLIKE THE FRB,I WOULDNT CAVE AND CERTAINLY WOULDNT BE SIGNING ANY CONFIDENTIALITY CLAUSES,HOPE THIS HELPS
HALCYON,100% NO CHANCE OF ME PAYING UPFRONT,ALREADY SEEN MY SOLICITOR OVER THIS MATTER AND I HAVE BEEN ASSURED THEY WOULD FIGHT MY CASE ON A NO WIN NO FEE BASIS IF IT CAME TO COURT,UNLIKE THE FRB,I WOULDNT CAVE AND CERTAINLY WOULDNT BE SIGNING ANY CO
Surely in a business sense the course would like to ( i.e. revenue ) know how many they have ''standing'' on any given day ?
Can't really see the point of your reluctance tbh !
Surely in a business sense the course would like to ( i.e. revenue ) know how many they have ''standing'' on any given day ?Can't really see the point of your reluctance tbh !
????????????????,THEY KNOW EXACTLY HOW MANY BOOKS ARE STANDING,AND THEY ALSO KNOW HAVE THEY HAVE DECIMATED THE BETTING RINGS VIA NEW AREAS,RIP OFF FOOD AND DRINK,BADGE AND ENTRANCE PRICES,DONT UNDERSTAND WHAT POINT YOUR MAKING ???????????????????????????
????????????????,THEY KNOW EXACTLY HOW MANY BOOKS ARE STANDING,AND THEY ALSO KNOW HAVE THEY HAVE DECIMATED THE BETTING RINGS VIA NEW AREAS,RIP OFF FOOD AND DRINK,BADGE AND ENTRANCE PRICES,DONT UNDERSTAND WHAT POINT YOUR MAKING ???????????????????????
I think we all are agreed that racecourse's couldn't give a gypsy's about on course bookmakers !
Your points about betting rings, cost of food and drink are valid.....
people will attend ( perhaps more so now with advent of pop concerts )..
but in essence the game ^ is dying !
Funny how you all want to soldier on....
must be the £ s methinks ! ?
I think we all are agreed that racecourse's couldn't give a gypsy's about on course bookmakers !Your points about betting rings, cost of food and drink are valid.....people will attend ( perhaps more so now with advent of pop concerts )..but in essen
Once saw Don Butler get the ''old bill'' involved when he fell out with the family that owned Wolverhampton at the time (c mid nineties).... name escapes me... plod found for Don & the other on course bookmakers !
Once saw Don Butler get the ''old bill'' involved when he fell out with the family that owned Wolverhampton at the time (c mid nineties).... name escapes me... plod found for Don & the other on course bookmakers !