There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
If anyone gets a moment check out the winning time for Auspicion in the 8:15 at Newcastle on 12/09/2017. Using the ATR replay you can clearly see the gates opening after 4 seconds and if you stop the clock as the winner passes the post you should see 1m 42 seconds on your screen. By my calculations this makes the winning time just over 98 seconds, not the record breaking 1m 36.28s advertised. The winning time is probably 1m 38.28s and someone has just made a typo resulting in the 2 second error but this is crazy isn't it?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 11
|
By:
I was looking at a runner earlier today. It had won twice over 12 1/2 fur. at Newc. The first win was off a rating of 69 and the time
given was 1:51.and change. It's 2nd win on a rat of 75 was shown as 9 seconds faster. How does a horse run 3/4 of a furlong faster than it did before. It then ran 2nd, same course/dist, and ran in 1:51 and change again. I'm convinced that there are tons of errors made in timings, but no-one gives a cuss. |
|
By:
Timeform has it 1m 38.65s
|
|
By:
As you say ATR and RP give it over 2 secs less
|
|
By:
Groundworker 00:58.8 G 84.6
Sulafaat 01:25.6 G 83.6 Crown Of Cortez 01:25.9 G 81.6 Amazing Grazing 01:27.8 G 68.4 Chrisellaine 01:28.5 G 64.1 Auspicion 01:36.3 G 94.8 Humble Hero 02:40.2 G 68.7 Sileel 02:46.0 G 30.1 |
|
By:
Horse_time_going_speedrating.
|
|
By:
Wont matter anyhow as time is not reliable. different day different story .
We all have been there and if it were that simple there would be no bookies . Try betting on swimming and as that is totally time based you will lose. Truly are horses easier ??? no fkn way so give that up. |
|
By:
Look everyone to their own but for me anyhow its better to consider the event and judge all the runners be it a horse race or a swimming event or footie. IMHO there are alot of other factors ot account.
|
|
By:
Many thanks Howard for spotting Timeform's winning time.
|
|
By:
They have to get it right
 |
|
By:
Ha !!!!!
Will it win again ? |
|
By:
Timeform has it 1m 38.65s
|