Oct 26, 2017 -- 5:36AM, DoesntMatter wrote:
8 judges, dave1357, not 9 (for what it's worth ... which is not much to PI)
IIRC the dissenting judge in the second round just disagreed on whether he could be an honest cheat, not that he was a cheat, but might be wrong.
Oct 26, 2017 -- 12:13PM, 1st time poster wrote:
asking for cards to be rotated,150 grand a pop when the right cards were coming out of the shoe,they must have smelt a rat long before they were the best part of 8 million down ,small stakes on losing hands and a 150 grand on the winning hands. he,s also got court cases pending with 2 or 3 American casino,s
not familiar with the details of this case but massive stake variation is usually a red flag, certainly should be
Oct 26, 2017 -- 12:59PM, dave1357 wrote:
You can bet on the player or the bank in punto so no need to vary the bets once the deck is sorted much as most times one side will have the advantage.