Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
garychesterrrr
26 Sep 17 14:07
Joined:
Date Joined: 21 Jul 12
| Topic/replies: 379 | Blogger: garychesterrrr's blog
Backed the fav to win by more than 2.5 lengths!

Looked 3.25 to me, they give 2.5. Naughty judge
Pause Switch to Standard View Winning distance - 1:50 Warwick
Show More
Loading...
Report duncan idaho September 26, 2017 2:10 PM BST
it's done by times, not 'how it looks'
Report Deltâ September 26, 2017 2:11 PM BST
nowt to do with judge's opinion -
Report garychesterrrr September 26, 2017 2:55 PM BST
Im fully aware how its worked out, just unsure whether they got it right this time. There are other occasions where the distances are declared incorrectly
Report devilsadvocate September 26, 2017 3:55 PM BST
I play the distances a lot and some of the decisions are beyond belief. Surely a simple freeze frame can give a trained judge (and most others) an accurate answer. Why the need for 'times' ?
I suppose the view to take is that it probably evens out in the long run but even so.
Report duncan idaho September 26, 2017 4:34 PM BST
what do you mean by freeze frame? the winning distance (indeed all distances between runners in the formbook) is the gap between them as each of them crosses the line (cos they havent finished the race til they cross the line) rather than the gaps between them as the winner crosses the line
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com