Dartmouth 1.16 layer on the line

1.16             £16,366

just watched it again and dartmouth still won wtf

The cameraman focus on the loser after the line then lay it !

When you need De Sousa....

won everywhere apart from the line

That will teach one to oi oi one's horses home. @RoyalFamily 2m ago

Queen just kicked in the tele.

Aug 25, 2017 -- 2:35PM, ghostlygunner wrote:

just watched it again and dartmouth still won  wtf

specsavers doesnt close till 5pm m8

you couldnt have watched the slow motion , and still thought dartmouth had won

Moore ridden out of it  by Ronald Macdonald ffs.

They all finished pretty bunched up considering the distance, bit of a suspect result I think. Backed sheikzayedroad who didn't get any room before staying on

equine flew    Joined: 28 Aug 02
Replies: 1480 25 Aug 17 14:37 
Queen just kicked in the tele.

PJ Mac leaving his wheels in the car park, just in case

if it were layed near line it was done on basis there would be a stewards..but then got the jackpot cos it looked winner doing over.

in real time cardenden

Yeah very weak event for the grade..... two **** that found less for pressure, and a horse who is better than these but no form over 2m gets chinned....

wazza , why wouldn't you lay one close home at 1.16 if there was a head bob likely ? ( there was a horse between 1st and 2nd so no chance of a stewards although I admit short price layers can have that on their side )

Was every chance of a stewards and a reversal in 2nd had won. 2nd caused winner and 3rd horse to drift right over the track

if

What problem is that to the dartmouth layer ? No chance of the winner losing it. correct ?

james is correct....

every chance it would have been a 1.01 job imv if it hadn't veered right and more than likely the stewards would've got involved....

1.01 was layed on the basis of a forthcoming stewards..not a man in world thort dartmouth hadnt held on going over line.

i thought lowest price was 1.16....?

1.05 lowest

think he means its 1.01 the 1.16 was laid on the basis there might be a stewards

disagree that looked 1.01 minus stewards possibility...honestly thought Montaly had nodded perfectly and dived for remote

1.05 was lowest...?

fk sake my graphs must be slow then....

i was surprised Dartmouth didn't hit 1.01 with the thin in running liquidity we are subjected to now.

going past the line 'live' i thought Dartmouth had won duncan...

Aug 25, 2017 -- 2:45PM, ghostlygunner wrote:

in real time cardenden

thats understandable if it was in real time

think vast majority did, HH