|
By:
if you're dave whos kiara then ...
|
|
By:
If YOU'RE Delta who's Crooser then...
|
|
By:
our labrador!!!
|
|
By:
If you back all the timeform top rated selection you will be skint pretty quickly,however if you back the two top rated selections you will be skint in half that time.
|
|
By:
You will be backing a lot of jollies(NAP)
|
|
By:
Perhaps, or much rather - The OP may well mean the, "Timeform Selection," from the Timeform Summary underneath the MARKETS, here on Betfair.
Whether those 1.2.3 'Selections' are IDENTICAL to the 'Top-Rated' on Timeform RACECARDS/Passes being open to discussion/confirmation. I doubt it - as anybody purchasing the Timeform Cards - solely for the Ratings (Order) would be pretty miffed - and it would also be poor marketing by Timeform, too. |
|
By:
@onlooker: Confirmed as you suggest - the TF 1-2-3 are absolutely *not* the 3 top-rated horses in rating order. Speaking as someone who buys the (online) Race Passes pretty much solely for the ratings.
|
|
By:
Does seem a bit smoke & mirrors if there top 3 rated on BF are not there top 3 in order
The 3 highlighted under BF tips & previews are the top rated number 1 under BF racecard As looky says - other viewers would be pretty miffed also if they were putting up others as top rated |
|
By:
@madhatters wouldn't make sense for the 3 top-rated to be the 1-2-3
- they might be running at sub-optimal distance - they might be running on sub-optimal going - they might be out repeatedly with short breaks Not sure I understand what you mean by this: "The 3 highlighted under BF tips & previews are the top rated number 1 under BF racecard" |
|
By:
You would think that TF would have calculated all those points into a top 3
Look on the exchange toolbar next to tradefair & they give their 3 best bets for the day They equate to the top in each race on BF racecard & no they ain't profitable to follow ![]() |
|
By:
@madhatters
I'd expect them to calculate them into the 1-2-3 I'd not expect them to calculate them into a horse's ratings (any more than they are included in the OR or the RP rating) so the 1-2-3 won't necessarily map to the top-3 rated. |
|
By:
Why not list them alphabetically then or by colour
What is the point of putting a top 3 up ![]() Whether you believe they are "ratings" or not They are put up as TF top rated 1,2,3 |
|
By:
They are put up as a "Timeform 1-2-3", not a "Timeform top-rated 1-2-3".
They are (I infer from context) intended to be the three horses most likely to win the race. Looking at the link you mention makes this clear I think: the betting.betfair article for the 5.15 at Yarmouth tomorrow reads "Timeform Top Rated: 108p 3. BARTHOLOMEU DIAS Charles Hills William Buick 93 2. BARFORD Pam Sly Rob Hornby 84p 1. THE LAST EMPEROR Roger Varian Andrea Atzeni Analyst's Verdict: It's hard to look beyond Bartholomeu Dias, who followed his promising debut effort with an even better performance at Royal Ascot where he was fourth in the 15-runner Chesham Stakes. The Last Emperor made a winning debut over this C&D 3 weeks ago, but has more on his plate under a penalty so bigger threats could be posed by newcomer Il Primo Sole and Barford." Whereas the Timeform 1-2-3 shown on the main BF site (with the same commentary) are: Bartholomeu Dias Il Primo Sole Barford (IRE) |