Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Sultan
01 Apr 17 10:58
Joined:
Date Joined: 30 Jun 00
| Topic/replies: 677 | Blogger: Sultan's blog
Can they legally short change each way backers of first 4 home to fund paying out an extra place. Hills and Paddy Power both paying 1/5 1.2.3.4.5.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 14
By:
adge
When: 01 Apr 17 11:01
no , they must pay 1/4 odds under the rules of their gambling commission licence...paying a 5th place is a concession only
By:
ellis
When: 01 Apr 17 11:14
bfred and tate 1/4 5 places
By:
nc
When: 01 Apr 17 11:29
Freds odds are appauling..well under the correct price
By:
nc
When: 01 Apr 17 11:31
Yes, I think Hills wil have big complaints over 1/5 Lincoln odds
By:
longbridge
When: 03 Apr 17 15:20
@adge - what's your authority for "they must pay"?

@OP - I thought the Tatt's rules only applied to on-course bookmakers?

PP's T&C's say:

"From time to time we may offer promotions that pay out on extra placings in a horse race. In these instances we reserve the right to alter the standard place terms as set out above (e.g. we may offer to pay out 5 or 6 places in a handicap with 16 or more runners but to do so at 1/5 of the odds as opposed to standard 1/4)."

and I imagine they've run them past their lawyers....
By:
IanP
When: 03 Apr 17 15:27
Think adge was referring to on course bookmakers where meddling with the place terms in now banned.
By:
longbridge
When: 03 Apr 17 16:57
@IanP - I read adge as replying to the OP's original question about PP and Hills and I wouldn't have thought that was on-course?
By:
Send.in.the.clowns
When: 03 Apr 17 17:20
1/5th the odds (6 places) in the grand National PPs Confused
By:
adge
When: 03 Apr 17 18:25
hi longbridge...I'm reading your terms and conditions from paddy power with interest.
I and all other british bookmakers are licenced through the gambling commission who have set specific rules on place terms and the minimum allowed for both on course and off course which have a slight set out difference....not sure how that affects paddy power who are of course registered in Ireland.
as an example ..there were two course bookmakers who set up last year at the grand national to bet 1/5th 1-2-3-4-5 but were stopped within minutes and instructed that they must bet 1/4 odds or must stop betting [ one did bet 1/5th first 3 which didn't come to light until later but that was another story ].
I'm not happy with that phrase "we reserve the right to alter standard place terms " at all. at best a grey area
By:
SHADDER
When: 03 Apr 17 19:10
adge
William Hill were going 1/5 the odds 5 places in the lincoin
I am not sure if this was both in the shops and online.
Are you saying they are not allowed to do this ?
Perhaps Intheknow will add his views also
By:
democrat
When: 03 Apr 17 20:47
What terms would jockey have offered if he'd had his way adge ? Is it drinks all round after the great Shell Houston escape ? Ooops I forgot it's dominoes night - so off air ! Sad
By:
differentdrum
When: 03 Apr 17 20:58
I think there is a movement towards a general reduction in concessions in place terms. The 1/4 first 5 which might have been relatively commonplace is being replaced by 1/5. Bet 365 didn't even offer an extra place.

Very few of the firms offered a 1/4 on their Cheltenham ante-post markets.
By:
pa lapsy
When: 03 Apr 17 21:48
The "shrinkinflation" of the betting world imo,

Trumpeted as a screaming "major" concession,i don't think I am a fan for the obvious lesser win prices and if placed in the standard terms,it is a loss, accept it can work in your favour and think overall there would be little in it. Maybe it is an effort to try to bring around indeed as said above "new terms", I doubt very much the books are doing this for the good of the punter,interesting to see the way it goes over time.
By:
longbridge
When: 04 Apr 17 10:14
@adge

PP are (quotng their footer, but it has to be the case for them to legally advertise in the UK) "and for customers in the UK, licensed and regulated by the Gambling Commission."

Where's this bit documented "the gambling commission who have set specific rules on place terms and the minimum allowed for both on course and off course"?  I read through I load of the GC's guff a year or two back and don't recall tripping over anything like this.
By:
dsfibber
When: 04 Apr 17 10:24
I'm pretty sure the gambling commission don't care what terms you bet to, as long as they are clearly stated when accepting a bet.  Bookmakers are free to bet to whatever terms they want.

On Course bookmakers are restricted by the racecourses in what they can offer.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com