|
By:
Like the look of A Tail Of Intrigue in the 3.00. Useful for Williams a couple of years ago and there is money for this one, got 6.2 and 2.5, fingers crossed that Henderson has worked the oracle after a long lay off.
|
|
By:
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
All 6 of Henderson's ran appalingly. Hard to figure this stable these days. Used to be a dream for backers. Can't all be put down to ordinary jockeys. I only ever back his double figure priced ones now. He must surely have the worst winning ratio of odds-on shots to winners of all trainers in the last few years.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Never back that guy and usually don't bet in a race where he has a runner.
|
|
By:
That's a lot of high class races that you won't be backing in then kipling and a huge amount of mediocre ones!
|
|
By:
Who are you talking about Elliott or Henderson? My last remark was about Elliott.
|
|
By:
According to my Proform database Henderson's strike rate with odds on shots over the last 7 years, including this one, is 65%. In 2016 it was 70% and this year , up to a few of days ago when I last updated the database, it is 85%. The strike rate for all trainers over the 7 years is about 60%. So either Henderson is considerably better than average and people's perceptions are wrong or the database is defective in a major way. I don't think it is the database but I am willing to be persuade otherwise.
|
|
By:
Sure your database is right K but that would include all those 1/4 to 1/10 shots that are two stone in.
|