Will be thrown out !!

looks a rare straightforward throw out tbh

will keep it

what was 1st past post please?

Is Cunningham on this grey by any chance?

best horse won

FPP pilgrims

pilgrims 9/4
antartica 4/9

pil 7/4 ant 4/7

and the 2nd made the 1st bump just after the last,ruk will be on in the stewards room should the media be influencing any decisions

YOU ALL KNOW THE RULES,IF THE SECOND WAS A 33/1 NO STEWARDS WOULD BE CALLED,BUT ITS A WELL BACKED 7/2 SHOT AGAINST A 9/1 POKE,TRIPLE BENT YOU ONLY HAVE TO LOOK AT THE LEDGER RESULT AND NUMEROUS OTHER STEWARDS ENQUIRIES,ONLY ONE OUTCOME,AMENDED!

the 1st bump was 50-50 imo then its bumped and carried across, FPP goes in almost every country and probably even this 1

ADT bumped into PB first

winner was idling

IF THE FAV CROSSED THE LINE FIRST WITH THE SAME SENARIO THE BETTING ON THE STEWARDS WOULD BE REVERSED FACT!

For what its worth, and I had no bet, I'm not sure it ahould be reversed, I don't think there's actually any contact? Good luck to everyone who has had a go!

RESULT STANDS

LOL YIFTER MELTDOWN

correct decision Cunningham fuming lol

HEADLINE ARTICLE TONIGHT ON NEWS AT TEN!

stands, wd FPP bcks and enquiry bcks

can do what you want if you are FPP

Factmachine
YOU ALL KNOW THE RULES,IF THE SECOND WAS A 33/1 NO STEWARDS WOULD BE CALLED,BUT ITS A WELL BACKED 7/2 SHOT AGAINST A 9/1 POKE,TRIPLE BENT YOU ONLY HAVE TO LOOK AT THE LEDGER RESULT AND NUMEROUS OTHER STEWARDS ENQUIRIES,ONLY ONE OUTCOME,AMENDED


What a complete mug.

CORRECT RESULT IMO,BUT THE FACT THAT THE WINNER WAS 15/8 IN THE STEWARDS TELLS YOU ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW YOU MUG!

worst case of tv punditry in a long time, blinkered stuff, yifter ought to have higher standards. the horses barely brushed, loads of cases during the summer in flat races with clear cut barging, and nothing done. how anyone could interpret that as a "clear cut" case for altering the places is unbelievable.
did the best horse win?, yes. accidental interference and possibly a glance when both drifted. stewards correct to allow the placing stand.

TRIPLE BENT,FACT!

Amazed at how biased commentators have been on this race.

The grey horse was the first one to clash with PW....as moved towards it! FACT.

PW jockey had to fight back and did so....

Have seen far worse cases than this one ...where Stewards get decision "wrong".......in this case I believe they got it correct.

Makes a change!

I backed the Nicholl's one ....but had already layed it a bit to go "all green" so never really cared which one won.

CONFUGURATION OF THE COURSE MAKES IT LOOK WORSE AND THE 2ND HAD A 100YDS NEAR THE END TO GO PAST IF GOOD ENOUGH

they were still drifting left till 20yds out.

roida just hold your hands up, it was about 20 people on here to keep it and you and GC saying it should be reversed.

you do get one incorrect now and again, no shame in that

fair play if anyone bet it to stands...all im saying is imo ive seen far less get disq.

I thought the 2nd had a strong case as well, I got it wrong

TAKE NOTE OF HOW BETFAIR DELAY SETTLING RACES WHERE THE FAV HAS FINISHED SECOND LAST RACE AT SANDOWN A PRIME EXAMPLE,YET SETTLE INSTANTLY WHEN A FAV WINS,CANT THINK WHY

GC made a fair point about having to know exactly who the stewards are before betting. There's no consistency in their decisions, which means a Pullein-style "no bet" every time from me.

I thought the second was fav to get it but not as short as  1/2.