that brutal cut up cost the second 3 lengths

The winner in any normal country with proper rules would be disqualified.

Agreed, ought to get the race but can't see it happening.

stewards still having lunch.

The rules in this country are a joke.  U can put a horse over the rails and still be allowed to keep a race.  It's like a win at all costs

stewards now.

The biggest nonsense of the lot is this so called winning distances debacle.

Would have already been thrown out in US before the Newcastle stewards called the enquiry

surprised to see 11k done at 1.01,  must have known a chance of stewards ...

They obviously looked at it before announcing it. Very poor just call one.

correct kriskin, the more you hamper a horse the further it is likely to be beaten

the perfect example of why the rules are wrong

Chapman back peddling quickly now, thinks the second was beat. Not for me

The Racetech boys will be having a good day today at these tracks.....

it was a neck behind then went 2L behind...3 my 4rse

was a neck behind, then knocked back 2 lengths, only beat 3/4 length. Best horse obv lost

squeaky backside time now 

overturned

revised result

last price on the 2nd 2.98

stunned

Well well well, good thing I got out there.

Surely one of the worst decisions in history. it was only closing because he was taking it easy on the winner.

JUSTICE

The 2nd went as high as at least 65 in the stewards.

Staggering.

i think it should have gone but under the rules they operate never in a month of sundays did i think it would be reversed

im very suprised they chucked winner...

but..i said to lads in our room that 2nd was a neck down and its lost 2L and beat a closing 3/4L...

Wrong decision with our rules. I reckon they had ATR on and just wanted to get back at Chapman.

To be honest the betting indicates what a ridiculous decision it was. A remarkable misinterpretation of the rules. No consistency.

The inconsistency is beyond a joke.

They did the correct thing for once, shame they dont do it every time, most of the time they thing its greyhound racing rules

It might be morally the right thing but under the rules it was clearly an appalling decision.

i concur ^

very strange just looked at stewards' report and it says 'no enquiry'.

http://media.britishhorseracing.com/pdf/stewardsreport/?fixtureId=1198&year=2016

The Stewards held an enquiry under Rule (B)11.6 into possible interference inside the final furlong. Having
heard their evidence and viewed recordings of the race they found that the winner, SINCIL BANK (USA),
ridden by Joe Fanning, had interfered with MUSHAIREB, placed second, ridden by David Nolan, and that
the interference had improved SINCIL BANK (USA)’s placing. The Stewards found that Fanning had
allowed his mount to drift left carrying MUSHAIREB across the track towards the rail causing Nolan to take
back when he was approximately half a length behind SINCIL BANK (USA). Following the interference
Nolan was approximately 1½ lengths down after having lost momentum and having to switch around to
renew his effort, then rallying to be beaten only ¾ a length in the short distance to the line. They placed
MUSHAIREB first, and SINCIL BANK (USA), second. The Stewards found Fanning in breach of Rule
(B)54.1 and guilty of careless riding in that he allowed his mount to drift left without correction. They
suspended him for 2 days as follows: Monday 12 and Tuesday 13 September 2016.

bookies have to payout twice this the problem there needs to be a delay of like 2 minutes of announcing the result so they wont have to pay out twicew

Just back in after being away for the day after that race today.  A very nice surprise to read this thread and to see my bank well up after laying the FPTP.  As stated earlier thought the FPTP should have been chucked out but didn't think the stewards would with the rules we have.

so you didnt think it would be chucked but laid it?

the £11k 1.01 i/r was very odd given what had happened. 

1.01 boys don't normally get involved with a good chance of a stewards.

same happened few weeks back...blatanly obvious  was gona be stewards and was done at 1.01..ridic

Aug 29, 2016 -- 9:50PM, roida wrote:

so you didnt think it would be chucked but laid it?

roida - laying it at 1.05 and less was not a BIG risk. In my view it should have been chucked out but we know the stewards in this country

would you lay tomorrow aint wednesday at 1/1,000.000 cos it aint a big risk?

roida - different ball game.  There was a slight chance FPTP should have been disqualified. In my view I would have chucked it out (Reason for laying) but as stated previous we know how the stewards operate in GB

Well that aint guaranteed now , is it.

No interest today but the cucumber sarnie eaters have phucked it right up now, and i can tell you one person who will never bet in a SE again.

Today's decision has put a different perspective in the SE's going forward

Stewards have gone mental. Boots filled.

The biggest effect of intereference on a result yesterday was El Astronaute. I benefitted from a place only on Humidor who finished second but the interference meant that Hey Chewed and Huntsmans Close were denied at least second and third while Hey Chewed might well have won. So bets on at least 4 other runners were affected by the interference by the winner. If they had run straight, the result might well have been Hey Chewed, El Astronaut, Huntsmans close, Humidor. I know that horses don't run in straight lines, but that was an extreme example of a race being affected by illegal riding.

98% follow the epsom camber...hardly illegal.

The betting on the outcome of this stewards enquiry was remarkable.

The eventual winner was being laid at around 30 - 40 midway through the enquiry although obviously the longer it went on it did gradually shorten up.

Just b4 the announcement there was a massive move to back it at all rates down to around evens and i can only presume someone got the lot after knowing what the outcome of the enquiry was slightly b4 it became public knowledge.

that is correct dyno...there is another thread where its discussed in full....the money was recovered from the hooverers.

Thanks roida.. what thread was that please > Thanks in advance

Found it..tar