No Derby winner since 1999 has has been greater than 7/1

If that stats is to remind the same that means only 2 horses can win the race.

Correct

interesting stat

both of mine bigger than 7/1

Stats ever lie

13/2 winner

Was tempted to back all 3 horses 7/1 and under.

Back other and put savers on the 7 and unders. came out slight up.

Stat wins

nice one

1st (9)        6 Harzand (IRE)    D K Weld    3    9-0    P J Smullen     7/1

2nd (15)1½    15 Us Army Ranger (IRE)    A P O'Brie     R L Moore             4/1f
3rd (8)    1¼    8 Idaho (IRE)    A P O'Brien    3    9-0    J A Heffernan     14/1
4th (13)   16 Wings of Desire    J H M Gosden                L Dettori              6/1

every horse shortened in the betting

On-course book percentage: 125.61

Stat broken

Lifter  - Stats intact 7/1 winner.

13 div 2 = 6 1/2

Jun 4, 2016 -- 10:57AM, Lifter wrote:

Stat broken

Harzand the 45th winner ?????? have a guess

45th 3rd fav ?

45th winner with 7 letters in its name

ok
the only way i see this stat being put to any punting use is that you bet the market principals according to price
So i imagine before the off you are already on
Wings at 5/1 (16% market share)
The Ranger at 6/1 (14% market)
Then at the last minute you spring into life when you see Harzand go to 13/2 (13% market)
That gives you combined 43% of the market equating to about an 11/10 shot
Always considering you were able to get on in time,
You werent busy recalculating your liability on Wings and The Ranger
That your bookmaker was going to take more than the 50p max on Harzand..

Fair play if youre clued up for this
What it actually means is that most punters had they fancied Harzand would surely have availed themselves of the 10/1 and bigger earlier in the day.
It would be staggering for someone with a fancy for Harzand to lay off backing it at double figs only to wait til he drops below the magical 7/1, simply on the say so of a stat