|
By:
sp 8.56
|
|
By:
sprint to extended mile Sir Marks trick
![]() |
|
By:
Looked the best horse by some way in the paddock
|
|
By:
yes but his would have been 7/4
![]() |
|
By:
zipper told me once these types are lays cos they have no form
![]() |
|
By:
stride thats not true.. all my lays and backs are under 16/1
|
|
By:
it was 8.56 zip
I remember you telling me a prescott 3 runs beaten soundly all starts was a lay and i told you you were p1ssing in the wind as to what ability it actually had on how the trainer has got winners for years. On that occasion you were actually right then the next day one beaten up even worse in its qualifying runs sluiced up at a short price ![]() |
|
By:
laying i take a good look at the first 4 in the betting and the form ... why 3 of em will get beat... its a no brainer get 33/1 shots when they win and they do now and again its a long way back into profit
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
i dont have nothing too do with MR Prescott.. ok hes clever
|
|
By:
and you're not
|
|
By:
Prescott seems to me to take advantage of the rules. He DOES run stoutly bred ones over short distances until they get a mark ( pun intended ).That's the problem with a centralised handicap which doesn't take into account distance or course ( though for some reason they will distinguish between a/w and tur ).
|
|
By:
*turf
|