Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
foxy
21 Feb 16 09:35
Joined:
Date Joined: 26 Dec 00
| Topic/replies: 13,063 | Blogger: foxy's blog
i suspect they are using the security issues in europe as the reason if that is the case it would be a shame.
Pause Switch to Standard View why are cheltenham not allowing rdt...
Show More
Loading...
Report democrat February 21, 2016 12:22 PM GMT
Hi foxy hope you are well. Since spare equipment will undoubtedly be required where will it be located ?
Report foxy February 21, 2016 12:43 PM GMT
hello democrat

i am told in the car parks,it looks like rdt staff will have to carry batteries through crowds of upwards of 50,000.
Report parispike February 21, 2016 1:44 PM GMT
I can see the negatives but not the positives in that.
Report democrat February 21, 2016 1:49 PM GMT
The least Cheltenham can do is provide a secure storage area. There must be several given the size of the areas available.
Report parispike February 21, 2016 2:10 PM GMT
Them betting shops might be available.Mischief
Report foxy February 21, 2016 2:50 PM GMT
perhaps they dont wont to provide a secure storage area to help racecourse bookmakers.
Report quixall February 21, 2016 8:03 PM GMT
Got nothing to do with 'racecourse bookmakers'.

It has a lot to do with FRB and one of the three Directors: and where you stand with that particular gentleman. If you send out an email to all RDT customers including your own correspondence with a particular FRB Director, whom I am led to believe tries to throw his diminutive weight around on the racecourse politics side and in particular over the Courtyard issue [I couldn't possibly comment not knowing the full facts], then I am hardly surprised at what has gone on.

Nothing to do with ALL, but by all accounts a lot to do with ONE- don't you think ?
...
Report intheknow February 21, 2016 8:32 PM GMT
Foxy, it might not be a done & dusted No so watch this space

Text me
Report democrat February 21, 2016 10:10 PM GMT
If you are right quixall - I stress 'if' - is making RDT's job more difficult not a strange course of action ? Perhaps the racecourses are beginning to gain a better understanding of how bookmakers are represented and are far from impressed. Fewer, more representative bodies is the way forward.
Report factmachine February 22, 2016 10:54 PM GMT
QUIXALL,WHAT ABOUT"THE COURTYARD ISSUE"DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND?????????????
Report sandysboy February 23, 2016 6:23 PM GMT
RDT have a meeting with Cheltenham Friday, am told its a security issue, also if anything is left unatended it is liable to be removed by security staff
Report mincer11 February 23, 2016 6:43 PM GMT
Even the Irish rings are powered and they are usually 30 years behind the times .
If the rings were powered then there would be no need for any batteries.
Report foxy February 23, 2016 7:48 PM GMT
mincer

that was suggested last year but the racecourse brought costs into it.

the rails have power.
Report mincer11 February 23, 2016 8:08 PM GMT
It couldn't cost too much, why doesn't the racecourse get it done and charge the bookies a small fee daily , or why doesn't the bookmakers body get it done and charge daily.
Why can the rails be powered yet not the rest of the ring, the answer I assume is because the big bookies are all on the rails and fukk the rest of them .
Report foxy February 23, 2016 8:23 PM GMT
mincer the bookmakers body does not exist.
Report mincer11 February 23, 2016 8:36 PM GMT
There must be some sort of a body to fight their corner surely.
Report foxy February 23, 2016 8:44 PM GMT
no mincer everybody just looks after themselves ,even something like a till roll most would tell you they had no spare ones if you had run out,the first thing in there mind is if you cant take any bets they will be able to take more.very few of them would have been any use in the trenches.
Report mincer11 February 23, 2016 9:17 PM GMT
That's not a surprise I suppose, but isn't there a southern and northern bookies associations , or at least there used be.
Report foxy February 23, 2016 9:22 PM GMT
they do still have those associations but the one that makes all the decisions without any discussions has just 3 people in it,
Report foxy February 23, 2016 9:22 PM GMT
they do still have those associations but the one that makes all the decisions without any discussions has just 3 people in it,
Report foxy February 23, 2016 9:22 PM GMT
they do still have those associations but the one that makes all the decisions without any discussions has just 3 people in it,
Report foxy February 23, 2016 9:23 PM GMT
looking in as an outsider mincer i bet you think thats pretty odd .
Report mincer11 February 23, 2016 9:30 PM GMT
Yes it seems so .
Report factmachine February 23, 2016 9:48 PM GMT
AND WORSE STILL THE 3 THAT MAKE THE DECISIONS DONT LEND TILL ROLLS TO ANYONE Shocked
Report foxy February 23, 2016 9:56 PM GMT
Devilgood card tomorrow
Report democrat February 23, 2016 11:56 PM GMT
Points well made foxy ! All things being equal one would hope that evolution would bring about the urgent change that is required. Unfortunately revolution might be the only way forward since 'all things are NOT equal'. Unity and consensus is the only way.
Report democrat February 23, 2016 11:59 PM GMT
'is' perhaps should be 'are' Blush
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com