Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
First ride?
6/4 fav
6/4 fav
Show More
shouldn't be allowed on a racecourse that girl, don't care what ride it is
A power packed ride. Did the winning rider (jockey change) not get told by the way?
Some interesting tactical efforts in behind.
Some interesting tactical efforts in behind.
should never ride in another race, they have to learn but that was pathetic
First ride or not they should throw the book at her
Trainer should get banned for putting someone as brutally bad up.
People are betting on that.
People are betting on that.
Feb 19, 2016 -- 5:10PM, tomhunt wrote:
shouldn't be allowed on a racecourse that girl, don't care what ride it is
hate to agree but i do
she'll come on a bundle for that experience...remember the first cake i tried to bake, a right dog's breakfast it was..but the second was much better..quite presentable in fact (cherry and almond tart, i think)
Feb 19, 2016 -- 5:14PM, regvarney wrote:
thought she had another circuit to go ?
I reckon!!
people weren't betting hard earned money on your cake.
Friday, boys just walked in bookies and bet the last jolly , just to watch that circus of an effort.
Friday, boys just walked in bookies and bet the last jolly , just to watch that circus of an effort.
She is a workrider for Mulholland so has plenty of experience, dreadful ride.
she is either the worst jockey to ever have a ride in a rae or she didnt try an inch, one of the two
its not like she woulda been tired the horse travelled beautifully the whole way
I remember my first ride, it didnt last long but even i put more effort than that ;-)
dont think the horse responded to the jockey. it's just one of those things. jockey has a big future.
The horse was going so well, i'm quite sure she must have thought they had another circuit to go, glad it was so short as having her 1st ride prevented me from backing it.
even more annoyed now as had a double with that winner there
Feb 19, 2016 -- 5:20PM, quincy is a copycat wrote:
dont think the horse responded to the jockey. it's just one of those things. jockey has a big future.
Yeah. She'd better get used to saying 'what drink would you like with that'
Is that really "the best" that Miss R Waterson has got??!?? "Inexperienced" first ride or experienced 5millionth ride, that was absolutely pathetic. And with Pendleton's embarrassing effort earlier, it's no wonder women get told to stay in the kitchen with nothing greater than menial chores to occupy them.
Friday, boys just walked in bookies and bet the last jolly , just to watch that circus of an effort.
They deserve to lose , even if it had won they just would of doubled up on the next favs until it had all gone ....
They deserve to lose , even if it had won they just would of doubled up on the next favs until it had all gone ....
Race 6 - 5:05pm THE £10 FREE AT 32Red.com AMATEUR RIDERS' HANDICAP STAKES (CLASS 6)
The Stewards held an enquiry to consider the apparent improvement in form of the winner, PAO DE ACUCA (IRE), ridden by Will Pettis and trained by Jose Santos, which had never previously been placed. They interviewed the trainer who stated that the gelding had benefited from the removal of headgear and the step up in trip. Having heard his evidence they noted his explanation. They ordered PAO DE ACUCA (IRE) to be routine tested.
The Stewards then held an enquiry into the running and riding of BOSTON BLUE, ridden by Miss S A Coll and trained by Tony Carroll, which jumped out slowly and sat at the rear of the field, detached, before being asked for an effort entering the home straight to finish seventh, beaten 23½ lengths. They interviewed the rider and the trainer. They also received two reports from the Veterinary Officer who confirmed that both post-race examinations of the gelding failed to reveal any abnormalities. The rider stated her instructions were to drop out and to make of the best of her way home from 2 furlongs out and, as the gelding was quirky, she had been told not to use her whip. She added that, due to the fast early pace, she was happy to be detached in last place as she felt the leaders would come back to her in time. The trainer stated these were his instructions and that he was satisfied with the ride given. Having heard their evidence and viewed recordings of the race the Stewards found the rider in breach of Rule (B)59.4 and guilty of failing to take all reasonable and permissible measures to obtain the best possible placing. They suspended her for 12 days on dates to be notified by the British Horseracing Authority.
The Stewards held an enquiry to consider the apparent improvement in form of the winner, PAO DE ACUCA (IRE), ridden by Will Pettis and trained by Jose Santos, which had never previously been placed. They interviewed the trainer who stated that the gelding had benefited from the removal of headgear and the step up in trip. Having heard his evidence they noted his explanation. They ordered PAO DE ACUCA (IRE) to be routine tested.
The Stewards then held an enquiry into the running and riding of BOSTON BLUE, ridden by Miss S A Coll and trained by Tony Carroll, which jumped out slowly and sat at the rear of the field, detached, before being asked for an effort entering the home straight to finish seventh, beaten 23½ lengths. They interviewed the rider and the trainer. They also received two reports from the Veterinary Officer who confirmed that both post-race examinations of the gelding failed to reveal any abnormalities. The rider stated her instructions were to drop out and to make of the best of her way home from 2 furlongs out and, as the gelding was quirky, she had been told not to use her whip. She added that, due to the fast early pace, she was happy to be detached in last place as she felt the leaders would come back to her in time. The trainer stated these were his instructions and that he was satisfied with the ride given. Having heard their evidence and viewed recordings of the race the Stewards found the rider in breach of Rule (B)59.4 and guilty of failing to take all reasonable and permissible measures to obtain the best possible placing. They suspended her for 12 days on dates to be notified by the British Horseracing Authority.
I did not see it but judging by the posts it seems she give the horse a bad ride
And the stewards never even asked a questionwhat a fookin bunch of old farts they must be
what a fookin bunch of old farts they must be
TBF, you all knew that it was here 1st ride, yet still backed the horse without knowing anything about the jock..
Then when this happens you want her banned...
Then when this happens you want her banned...
you all knew that it was her 1st ride, yet still backed the horse
most on here didn't even back her , but then you put up that Pendleton was value and she did't even finish her race ....
most on here didn't even back her , but then you put up that Pendleton was value and she did't even finish her race ....
no I didnt.... I said the horse was value... bit of a difference 
Banning Miss SA Coll for 12 days after riding that old dog Boston Blue, yet these same people didn't think an enquiry was warranted when 'muscles' Murphy didn't push Packing out for third place?
Words fail me
Words fail me
18 Feb 16 21:04
lets face it , tomorrow should be a steering job.
4/7 is value in the context of this race....
4/7 included who was riding it , in this case Pendleton
lets face it , tomorrow should be a steering job.
4/7 is value in the context of this race....
4/7 included who was riding it , in this case Pendleton
Yes, but she had already had rides and we knew what she was like, they have to get round....
totally different story with the jock at lingfield.... you backed her knowing nothing about her..
totally different story with the jock at lingfield.... you backed her knowing nothing about her..
you backed her knowing nothing about her..
I didn't back her , your still sore about your embarassment over Pendleton ......
I didn't back her , your still sore about your embarassment over Pendleton ......
Sore ?, dont be childish.. I never had a bet in the race...
The point is, you are complaining about a ride given to a horse by a jockey having here 1st ride.. saying she should be banned...
I have heard it all know.
The point is, you are complaining about a ride given to a horse by a jockey having here 1st ride.. saying she should be banned...
I have heard it all know.
tomhunt 19 Feb 16 18:32
who backed her...it was totally inept,simple as
Of course it was, but what were you expecting?
She will learn as she goes along... the point is you will be aware what she is like when she rides again
who backed her...it was totally inept,simple as
Of course it was, but what were you expecting?
She will learn as she goes along... the point is you will be aware what she is like when she rides again
You would think first ride meant first time a jockey had sat on a horse the way some hide behind that,
She'll have done plenty work on the gallops and on that horse for what it's worth.
There was no excuse for that ride
She'll have done plenty work on the gallops and on that horse for what it's worth.
There was no excuse for that ride
The point is, you are complaining about a ride given to a horse by a jockey having here 1st ride.. saying she should be banned...
Where on here is my complaining ?
Where on the forum have i said she should be banned ?
Try reading the thread first before making accusations , fool .
Where on here is my complaining ?
Where on the forum have i said she should be banned ?
Try reading the thread first before making accusations , fool .
you cannot learn as you go along in the public domain when you are not fit for purpose,there is no excuse in this day and age with the pony racing ,jock schools,that girl looked like she had never pushed a pram never mind ever been on an equicizer...you had an ex jock in the studio slagging it off which is as rare as rocking horse $hite...rides again,very much doubt it after that
It was a class 6, amateur riders handicap at Lingfield. I'd be embarrassed to say I had a bet in the race, never mind coming on here moaning about it afterwards. Typical "blind fave" backers imo.
Can you stick a few more places on "Clowns League", Roida.
Can you stick a few more places on "Clowns League", Roida.
Do you need to have a bet on the race to have an opinion these days?
Not at all JD. There's a difference between voicing your unbiased opinion and moaning about losing money though.
I didn't watch the race myself, but I'm not at all shocked that a young girl had a bad ride on her first ever start.
I didn't watch the race myself, but I'm not at all shocked that a young girl had a bad ride on her first ever start.
Have to agree with s.kenbo. Why do people bet in these races?
no bet here but a class 6 or group 1 a winner is a winner something you'd be wise to learn
Most of my bets are in Class 6 or 7 races, but never amateur races.
most on here didn't bet in the race just expressing an opinion afterwards , mainly about the ineptitude of the rider of the second ....
Watch it kenbo, you might have a different opinion.
This first ride thing is nonsense. She'll have been riding horses against other horses for years, probably every morning.
No bet in race btw
This first ride thing is nonsense. She'll have been riding horses against other horses for years, probably every morning.
No bet in race btw
Where is koi keeper ? Is he hiding in the depths and darkness of his pond hoping the thread will go awayyyy
First ever ride, Dr - Probably frightened of letting go of the reins.
Yes onlooker I was thinking that.
Frightened of losing her balance probably.
Frightened of losing her balance probably.
True. She'll never have let go of the riens on the gallops before being the workout rider for the stable....
The first ride thing isn't nonsense imo. Doing something in a field on a day to day basis is totally different to going out on the track for the first time. You've got the TV cameras on you, the crowds around you, and to add to it all you're on a short priced fave that's expected to win.
There's no guarantee she would have won if she had hit it a few times but it would have looked better if she had.
Now we'll never know.
Looking at the performance of the jockey on the winner, if they'd have swopped places I think the result would have been the same.
She looked better than he did for most of the way.
Now we'll never know.
Looking at the performance of the jockey on the winner, if they'd have swopped places I think the result would have been the same.
She looked better than he did for most of the way.
Nonsense might be a bit strong but it's over used/milked
Nobody has mentioned that this horse found very little off the bridle lto after cruising in behind leaders and looking every inch the winner when taking it up. To be fair to the girl i thought she had given it a good ride right up until the final furlong where she showed limited effort to go past.
grey shark 19 Feb 16 19:12
Where is koi keeper ? Is he hiding in the depths and darkness of his pond hoping the thread will go awayyyy
Dont be silly... I have said what I think.... never one to judge on one run/ride alone...
when you resort to name calling, the credibility goes, if you had any in the 1st place.
Where is koi keeper ? Is he hiding in the depths and darkness of his pond hoping the thread will go awayyyy
Dont be silly... I have said what I think.... never one to judge on one run/ride alone...
when you resort to name calling, the credibility goes, if you had any in the 1st place.
Perhaps if you had bothered to read the thread from the start you would not of jumped in with your various accusations .
I was replying to the thread in general, but you took exception....it ok, no big deal.
Your replying to the thread in general was 'lumping' all on the thread as backers and then complaining about the ride given to the horse , when this was not the case , but you assumed it was because you didn't read the thread properly and are now trying to worm your way out of it .............
As stated on another thread, this was a race for AMATEUR RIDERS that had ridden LESS THAN 10 winners. So they're all pretty inexperienced and some of them badly so. It might even be fair to say that the odd one or two were sh1tting themselves and hanging on for dear life.
Unfortunately there's another one coming up on Wednesday, also at Lingfield - the 5:00, so it might be an idea if some of you don't bet on it. It's probably best if you don't watch either as it's not very good for your health by the sound of it.
Unfortunately there's another one coming up on Wednesday, also at Lingfield - the 5:00, so it might be an idea if some of you don't bet on it. It's probably best if you don't watch either as it's not very good for your health by the sound of it.
knows when and where there's another one...at 20 mins past midnight...wac
My job to know the programme and my brain doesn't go blank after midnight. Apologies if that makes me a coont. Apologies if you've done your conkers and are pocket-talking too. Like I said, best give Wednesday's race a miss and 'stick to what you know' (good luck with that one).
read the thread properly soapy bollox,anytime you want to put up your p&l against mine let me know,if you don't know how i can show you
Yeah, but I bet my c0ck's bigger than yours (yawn)......you want to read my post tbh. Good luck today 'tomhunt'.
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539