wtf

never seen that b4

i got 1.04

fill ya wellies

Backed Kemsing at 40.0.

PAY ME OUT BETFAIR!

tried to lay the outsider at 1.04 lol

Dear oh dear,what a fecking shower this lot are

Feel for anybody trading there

that's just terrific

Anybody get on

some nice prices on the shorties tho

No doubt my win bet will be voided!

Void????

EVERY Horse - ALL the same Price

them prices
palpable error again??????

oh dear oh dear oh dear oh dear

If that stands some of us will be happy

we could have backed every horse in race at 500 to 1....sounds like a bargain to me

If that stands some of us will be happy

and yet the graph on the winner just went down to the final 1.04 before suspend

a message will appear in an hour or so

They owe me, I tried to back the field at 40 and did not get matched. Criminal!

FFS!!

what happens if ya layed the winner ?

laid the winner about 2 furlongs out at 1.04  lol - bet that will stand

graphs normal though.

what does palpable error mean ?

I tried to lay Granita at 1.04 but it wouldn't accept my bet.

I bet it @ 2.2 and you could get 34 on them all

wtf went on there

I layed before off, should stand?

It wouldn't even take my bets a 10/1

curious cat
it means they are c**p! lol

I saw 70 just after the off !

anyone get on

All bets before the off will obviously stand

at one time they were all 1000.

....V.O.I.D........V..O..I..D...

Should be no palpable errors on exchange load of crap.... if I make a palpable error can i void my bet????

Anyone know if it caused problems ir with daq?

And this is the result of 'site maintenance'  ...... ?

"By migrating customers onto the new site we can improve the stability of the Exchange"


hahahahahahaha

Nae chance of getting paid

'Thanks for flagging it up to us' - they didn't even now about it.

know

SITE MAINTENANCE
WED 17TH FEB 02:00-10:00 GMT


As part of our continued efforts to give you the best possible Betfair experience some essential site maintenance is required.

They better settle bets struck before the balls up

COUDNT TRADE IN RUNNING SO ALL BETS SHOULD BE VOIDED IMO ...

the graphs still up show none of these fancy prices were matched.....

I tried to back the field at 50, only got matched on 3, all losers. Quite happy to swallow my loses, good luck to anyone that benefitted.

noone will benefit....all inrun void

just the IR win mkt affected tho?

Yeah, the graphs don't show any of the crazy prices, so maybe the rest that actually got matched will stand?

Pre-race bets should surely stand.

When the market turns IP and betfair work out the BFSP, are those pre off or IP bets?

I hope stu, had a big lay on Tombe Girl

Bets should be honored. It was only the display price that was incorrect, and that's just a guide anyway. The prices I was matched at represented the market at the time.

I hope pre race bets stand as I have been doing some arbing in the last couple of days with bookies to build up my points for the Cheltenham cash race. If not then this is a disgrace because I will have lost around £200 in the bets with the bookies. Also got my money tied up so can't do the 4/1 bet 365 offer for 3:05. I hope common sense prevails and all in play bets get voided.

^betfair and common sense, haha. Usually it's if you make a mistake, it's your fault; if they do, sorry, it's not their fault.

Pre race will def stand , IR probably will too

dream on kelly.....they always void in running....when something goes t1ts up

No reason at all to void pre race though - nothing wrong with prices before the off.

Can imagine some people must have been badly burnt on this though, feel lucky i exercised as much restraint as i did

Can't see the reason to void IR, like I said, if you played, the prices you received were correct, it was just the display price that was not which is stated as a guide. Those that play on the ladder were oblivious, why should they be penalised

If you put a bet on pre race and it got matched IR then by definition there was no problem until after they got matched

they'll definitely void the IR win mkt, place mkt(s) were/seemed unaffected

Problem solved ...

The 'In-running' Course player fell off his Step-ladder - his laptop hit the deck, and ....

Betfair are working to resolve the issue

[   This image is no longer available.   ]

Those that got burnt surely couldn't have thought the prices on offer were genuine?

Ignore that and it was business as usual

COULD NOT TRADE IN RUNNING HAVING HAD PLENTY ON BACK AND LAY ..THIS CANT BE ALLOWED TO STAND SURELY ...RESTRAINT OF TRADE !!

overtime for the beavers

don"t worry boys and girls we have a update on wed everything will then run perfect

apparently same fault on daq and they have settled it.

Total Matched: GBP 981,220

I can't see why pre race bets are not settled yet.

void

void

void

sir warrick

Market closed got my pre event money though.

IF THEY PRESS A WRONG BUTTON BETS VOID

IF WE ARE PISSED AND PRESS A WRONG BUTTON WE ARE F*****

That was quick...

just got paid on pre-off place bet

****s took my in running bets!!!!!!!!!!!!!

disgusting way to run a company

My IR bets weren't void.

Yeah, my i/r lays got settled.

Feb 16, 2016 -- 9:41AM, Wesdag wrote:

Yeah, my i/r lays got settled.

post ya bets ta

My pre race bet has been paid

Angela,

if you can't take my word for it, then I really don't give a phuck.

All bets stand

I can, I'm just wondering how much ya made fella.

Nothing life changing.

roida 16 Feb 16 15:33 

apparently same fault on daq and they have settled it.
------------

Really?

How can two entirely separate DATABASES have the SAME unique problem?

The issue was nothing to do with transmission from the course - as in Video pictures - or anything like that.

It is like saying ASDA had a problem with their wharehouse Stocktaking system - and Australian Air Traffic Control suffered the identical issue.

truly amazed they can let that stand, a broken inplay Win mkt where prices and amounts displayed, for a sizeable part of the race at least, were to all intents fictitious.

no forum announcement is pretty shameful .

Feb 16, 2016 -- 9:59AM, onlooker wrote:

roida 16 Feb 16 15:33  apparently same fault on daq and they have settled it.------------Really?How can two entirely separate DATABASES have the SAME unique problem?The issue was nothing to do with transmission from the course - as in Video pictures - or anything like that.It is like saying ASDA had a problem with their wharehouse Stocktaking system - and Australian Air Traffic Control suffered the identical issue.

>Don't bots basically just echo the prices between the two. So one is wrong, both are wrong.

^ the only possible explanation