|
By:
What is the delay like?
|
|
By:
Woodbine was a success lol
|
|
By:
not sure but churchill stream was ok
![]() ![]() woodbine lv was delayed by about 4 seconds ![]() not sure if there is an aquaduct live stream ![]() but be very careful as this was posted today http://www.drf.com/news/betfair-gains-first-exchange-wagering-license-us will probably be like trying to do the aussie racing i/r ![]() |
|
By:
they need to add colours to the API at the very least
I played a few races at keeneland , wasn't too bad , but could still be improved speed wise . liquidity was low , but that's understandable as it's a new product . woodbine was unplayable . |
|
By:
lv is about 6 secs ahead of atr but about another 4 secs behind live...no liquidity...a complete waste of time.
|
|
By:
There was no liquidity when U.S. racing was in-running years ago, and that was when there was better liquidity on horse racing across the board...nowadays it will be, and is even worse....again, complete waste of time.
|
|
By:
http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30622079/us-in-play-racing-from-aqueduct-for-december
![]() |
|
By:
|
|
By:
yes darlo, I saw quite a few horses trade at silly price at keeneland, but I did't really look at woodbine as the stream seemed to be delayed a lot more than keeneland
probably better for layers than backers at the moment |
|
By:
It was nothing but a complete error the one on Saturday. Keeneland was great - initially certainly - for short price layers.
Liquidity at Woodbine wasn't enough probably to do much. |