|
By:
posy, I've decided to take a season off from the relentlessness, having done the last few, but good luck to anyone who wants to run it and take part in it.
|
|
By:
Very sorry to hear that.Whilst I only 'discovered' the competition last year ,it was great fun. I'd be hopeless at running it so hope someone else might run with it.
|
|
By:
lazy bast@rds
|
|
By:
crack on then Chavers... the stage is yours
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
You could always reduce the fixtures? If you did one meeting a week it could be more enjoyable?
I played a couple of years ago but having to put up selections for two or three meetings some days was a bit much, especially when you knew you wouldn't even be having a bet on any of them. |
|
By:
I'm sure the comp will still run cuz I think Bigsmiffy for one, who took it over from richardf, will see to that.
Regarding numbers, I think it did drop last season with even some dropping out who I considered stalwarts of the comp, so maybe as sk suggests, a new format is needed. |
|
By:
When it first started it was 1 meeting a day with some days off due to a less meetings throughout the winter. The odd day when there were 2 meetings , just 1 meeting was picked.
Last year most days seem to have 2 meetings and now and again there was 3 meetings in a day. Personally this ended up far too many and is probably why numbers reduced. |
|
By:
posy, you've twisted my arm!
Here's the deal - I'm going to run it but only doing one meeting a day, whichever one looks the most competitive, and we'll include Sundays too as there aren't many of them when there's an AW meeting on. And as a brucey bonus, Betfair are kindly going to put up some prize money for the November & December monthly comps. A thread will be up in due course with full details, comp starts November 9th. |
|
By:
That's really good news George...many thanks
|
|
By:
A glutton for punishment springs to mind!
![]() |
|
By:
I'm happy to commit to scoring one meeting a day, though it will probably be after its finished rather than IR, unless we're fortunate enough to have stridingedge or MegRyan to help out again.
|
|
By:
One meeting a day sounds good to me, I'll put my name down when you start the thread.
![]() |
|
By:
You don't have to put your name down sk, just post ya picks on the thread for the first meeting.
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
bring back richardf the original,
no cheap imitations please ![]() |
|
By:
Erm, he's too busy with his charity work, so summick is better than nowt, ya cheeky munky!
|
|
By:
I was one of those who dropped out as a result of the sheer relentlessness of it all but I think one meeting a day is much more manageable.
On deciding which meeting to select if there is more than one could be quite subjective. For instance, is a three runner race with each horse forecast at 15/8 more competitive than a fourteen runner race with a forecast evens jolly? I suspect the most objective and practical basis for deciding which meeting should be selected is simply number of horses declared. |
|
By:
People have indicated on another thread as well that just doing the one meeting / day is going to be a lot more preferable.
As for which meeting to select, hopefully it's going to be fairly straightforward, but I'll have a look at the number of runners and the betting forecasts, then make a decision. If it's a close call between an evening and afternoon meeting, then I may opt for the meeting that can be scored IR if we have a scorer with a preference for afternoon or evening. |