|
By:
new jockey required
|
|
By:
Finished like dancing brave
|
|
By:
An interesting ride there.
|
|
By:
exactly jackhat trust me she wont be riding for us again
|
|
By:
would suggest you maybe watch the whole race again
|
|
By:
Don't blame you, if that one was of my horses and I had backed it and the jockey produced a "ride" like that, he/she would never ride another one for me.
|
|
By:
seriously jesus you are relentless
|
|
By:
hpoefully we will get it back when gale force wins the next at kempton
|
|
By:
that horse looked a total dog
|
|
By:
You are very naive.
|
|
By:
so what was wrong with that one
|
|
By:
granted only watched it once but she was niggling along from an early stage
|
|
By:
whatyoulookingat • July 8, 2015 8:16 PM BST
exactly jackhat trust me she wont be riding for us again You own horses? lol you are utterly clueless, most jockeys would have given up well before the home straight. The jock almost got you some place money. |
|
By:
dave are you for real thankfully i dont have to talk to you in person
good luck for the future |
|
By:
thank you dave. though i was going mad there. just watched it again and imo she did well to finish where she did. the horse looks a total dog and only consented to run on when it was too late
|
|
By:
no doubt the conspiracy theorists will see it differently though.
|
|
By:
There were a few things I didn't like about the ride tbh.
Letting the horse lose his place early. And then giving it a reminder and immediate grabbing hold of his head rather than letting the horse respond. And the two reminders in very quick succession without giving the horse a chance to respond in the straight. |
|
By:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() add it to your fantasy collection |
|
By:
all walofs imho
have a good night |
|
By:
But at least it wasn't as blatant as the fix at Lingfield we witnessed earlier.
|
|
By:
there were a few things i did not like either barton
anyway get some back here just lay penjang paparaja in the next at bath this wont be winning trust me |
|
By:
Most people in racing either do not see, or do not want to see what is going on on a daily basis.
|
|
By:
I like the Stoute horse off a mark of 58 for what it is worth. But if I offer a reason for fancying it I will be accused of being a conspiracy theorist yet again.
|
|
By:
I also don't think the rag is a lost cause upped in trip after sticking on in a race that has worked out well for the grade the time before.
|
|
By:
barton you know the score good luck
|
|
By:
Who me? I am just a moaning conspiracy theorist!
Ta, all the best to you. Hope your horse gets a better ride next time out. |
|
By:
wd on the lay - sorry for being rude, but I didn't see anything wrong with Gannons ride, thought the horse seemed to be a bit iffy
|
|
By:
Thanks for the tip op,lay the fav.Stone last!
|
|
By:
Just as a matter of interest, was that an opinion based lay (I thought it had a bloody hard race only a week ago) or information based?
Result the same either way, just curious? |
|
By:
no probs dave good luck for the future
thats me done for the day see you all soon |
|
By:
That Stoute horse will win next time or the time after btw. Hasn't acted on the track for me in conjuction with very quick ground. There's no chance it won't be better than 58.
|
|
By:
only my opinion barton good luck to you also
|
|
By:
Probably same as mine then. I thought last time it ran it chased a sucidial pace (set by the massively drifting favourite incidentally) and had a proper hard race. Tonight they had it out too soon.
|
|
By:
whatyoulookingat owns as many horses as i do, zero.
|