|
By:
inrunning specialist I would imagine are watching..
|
|
By:
ahh the days of geoff...NO don't see the point now
|
|
By:
Would have thought MOST Sky Sports subscribers would have cancelled once the football season ended anyway.
Still Attheraces can't organise a clock when this show nobody watches is on, despite saying they would sort it out YEARS AGO... |
|
By:
I can only assume they put it on Sky Sports when they have no other live sport to show whatsoever.
|
|
By:
OVERSEAS - I know that SkySports3 is a second or so in front of ATR - BUT - THAT is NOT the point.
Somebody in SkySports Towers did not sit down and think ... We will put a few evening races on SkySports3 - so that some smartarses can work out that the 'in-running' pictures are a bit quicker. ----------- The whole logic - or, rather, lack of logic - in scheduling a Horse Racing programme on a separate Channel to a dedicated Racing Channel - that, anybody and everybody, who has SkySports3, can access the said Racing Channel defies, well ... LOGIC. It is the same 'LOGIC' when the Cheltenham Festival and Royal Ascot are on ... ATR have SOUND ONLY commentaries on their Channel. Just WHO do they think are sat there listening to those commentaries? - INSTEAD of changing channels to WATCH on Channel4 |
|
By:
Visually impaired people - who don't wish to listen to Gok Wan ?
|
|
By:
Very Good Facts!
![]() |
|
By:
Is it not for pubs and clubs that don't have ATR? I suggest that they also charge the advertisers more, as there are annoyingly no shows displayed during the breaks.
|