Here we go will Sweet taboo keep it ?

but it wiil

no chance

no chance of it being thrown out

Tough one for the stewards.

won too far imo

Agree that it should get the race but it won't.

that surely has to go.

Winning distance was about o.5 l which may be too much but loser was almost along side when nearly put through fence

Can't be any other result than this been thrown out ....

Best horse won.

half a length - will keep it

Layed the Stewards for a fair bit at 2.5 to 3s on market opening.

Will be shocked if it's overturned - she did absolutely everything

I think thats a classic case of a disq warranted and if it is not then it highlights what is wrong with the rules

short enough and cathy didn't seem too confident :p

Would have won further had she been able to keep it in a straight line.

It does not matter what the jockey did, only in terms of jock bans.

why should a horse keep a race if it ruins the chance of another horse winning it , just because of the distance it won ?

wins by a nose/thrown out  , wins by 1 length/keeps it

bonkers

( not necessarily talking about this race )

Under the rules this will not be disqualified, fill your boots at 1/3

fair play to the sa pundit put his money down. 1.3 is a sh1t price shd be 1.5

Hardie is an absolute dunce for not for not taking it to the left very early in the race when the beast was hanging to the right

800 at 1.3 our SA friend/judge

Jul 4, 2015 -- 2:48PM, pablo-fanque wrote:

why should a horse keep a race if it ruins the chance of another horse winning it , just because of the distance it won ?wins by a nose/thrown out  , wins by 1 length/keeps it bonkers( not necessarily talking about this race )

becuas eof the way the rules are. The stewards have to say with certainty that the runner up would have won without the interference, the closer the margin the easier that decision becomes. The rules are bonkers imo.

flatcap 04 Jul 15 14:44 
Best horse won.


correct..

They should be showing the head on from the start, ffs! Impeded the 2nd for 6f!

You can't say the second would have won. Being held by winner in last 50 yards. Interference - yes, but the second wasn't gaining at the end.

To be fair the runner up would have won if good enough as they say, it had opportunities to get up

i'm on sweet taboo but obviously covered stake.

Special duty got the guineas when not half as much impeded.

certainly taking their time about it.

a good chunk done at 1.01 there, well done BF..

Cathy Gannon probably on her knees

not touching leicester again today, absolutely stinks. being on track there must be like finding money in the street

Sweet taboo keeps it

Will take a while to settle due to the hoovering.

Jul 4, 2015 -- 3:01PM, Wesdag wrote:

Will take a while to settle due to the hoovering.

no it won't Wes, BF don't give a cr@p

No

If that was an Irish stewards, they would've made sure that was settled correctly before the result was known.

Disappointing from BF.

And they wonder where all the in-running players have gone

poor effort by bf to allow bets to be place after announcement.

If anyone that had their money swiped after the announcement was made, complained, Betfair would go through the bets and re settle correctly.

They've been made to do it before. You have to phone them up and point it out though.

It's very simple.

Disqualify and the bookmakers' double result offers kick in.

This leads to less bookmaker profits, and so less revenue for racing.

This, without any doubt whatsoever, will have been made very clear to the BHA by the bookmakers, who, unambiguously, are now in commercial partnership to remove punters' money.

A jockey is going to get seriously injured sooner or later, as all bets are now off when it comes to the rules if the prize is big enough, but hey, it's all about the ££££££ for the BHA and its bookmaker cohorts...