Photo finish @ Hamilton

It's incredible how a delayed announcement makes one begin to doubt one's eyesight.

I stayed in but I did have to step away from the computer to regain my composure.

Really?

Seems like I dodged a bullet then cos usually they take the easy route and have a dh.



Been done like that before.

had a guess and then made it a head to disguise the guess

do you hoover up on these photo's Steve? I always find my keep bets stay up and get nicked in less than a second even though I frantically push the cancel button to try and clear them. Sometimes there seems to be about 10 seconds between the end of the race suspend and re opening for photo betting, it always seems a bit suss.

onlooker 30 Jun 15 18:31 
PHOTO-Finish PRINT - somewhat suspiciously - NOT up on BHA Results site.

roida 30 Jun 15 17:07 
technical problem so judge went from her eyesight



yes big aitch i have a massive opinion and bet accordingly if im certain..i often bet £25,000 to win amounts from £100-£300 if i have to lay massive prices to get anything

I thought that you were joking - when you posted that, "technical problem,"  earlier.

Ruk did say after the race that there was, "No electronic time taken," -
- and then they later said, "1m 12 secs - Hand timed" - when they put the caption up.

HOWEVER - there is NOW a time on the BHA WebSITE of .... Winning Time: 1m 11.60s

roida good luck with these massive outlays for small returns but bear in mind you only have to get a objection for something that you didn't see 4 furlongs or jumps out or the dreaded FAILED TO WEIGH IN announcement I got a massive fright years ago at redcar when betting on the photo and a objection was lodged for interference 2 furlongs out still haven't spoke to anyone who saw anything anyway thankfully result stood  but it stopped me doing these bets on track but as I said good luck I know it takes some bottle to place these size of bets

thankyou 77 but im well aware of the pitfalls...