|
By:
it was close tho'
![]() |
|
By:
Get it back with Hors de Combat.
|
|
By:
To win or lose?
|
|
By:
yes you can keep going and then claim success
i don't claim to be a guru but i do know your little system is bonkers ![]() |
|
By:
see proof everyone
![]() |
|
By:
luv it.
![]() bonkers or not - makes me more munny than yow. ![]() |
|
By:
you are a prize nugget
heavy odds on you've done yer nads already laying some of the recent favs ![]() |
|
By:
Hors de Combat loses, normal service resumes. bye !
|
|
By:
You're one from two yet you're still down.
|
|
By:
stick them up on one thread over 3 months
|
|
By:
I did.
![]() see.. it's rare for more than 7 favs to win in any series of 10. one of many of my bonkers rools. |
|
By:
yes but we all know there are enough spells that fcuk this up or we'd all be doing it
![]() put these up over 3 months |
|
By:
Also, favs are down since this last correction by over 20 points at ISP. So watch'em start losing now at the stat returns to the mean...
![]() |
|
By:
walofs
![]() |
|
By:
oh yes. walofs it is to be sure.
|
|
By:
you couldn't make it up, the first time i came across you on here you claimed you'd layed 10/11 favs on the bounce and then claimed we were due a winner.
so this is totally against your logic then you took 3 attempts for the winner to come but you claimed success absolute tosh and you won't kid anyone! |
|
By:
thank fook I went off the thread title
cheers ![]() |
|
By:
lay out todays racing in time order in a grid. then cross them off as you go. You'll see what I mean.
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
dont laff. its true !
|
|
By:
anyways - watch 'em start losing now.
|
|
By:
lex is a genius
the fact that many analyse just about everything you could think of statistically these days in racing but he has a system with no logic based on nothing more than random distributions around the expected average. then to come on and tell everyone, really is white coat stuff. |
|
By:
luv ya man.
![]() |
|
By:
Actually I'm an Evil Genius, the archenemy of Superman
|
|
By:
you are a genius getting me to react tbf, a weakness i still have to my detriment
![]() |
|
By:
change the record lex
|
|
By:
Second in a Dewhurst in a listed race!
|
|
By:
Second in a Dewhurst in a listed race!
|
|
By:
thats 4 losers. next one will lose as well. Huntsmans close
|
|
By:
Lex is one of the most dangerously intelligent men on the planet- a super-villain, a brilliant scientist, a billionaire industrialist, and Striding's greatest enemy. This combination makes him an extremely powerful and formidable opponent; he is ruthless, efficient and creative. In addition to his personal vendetta against the man who thwarts his every scheme, he despises the alien Guru from an ideological standpoint for contradicting his human achievements. He has always been a controversial figure in the public eye due to LexCorp's corrupt business dealings, but he has also maintained political popularity.
Not sure about the last bit but its close enough.. ![]() |
|
By:
you lay them as default though so last few days i would imagine not been good for you.
then you come on after a few more favs and claim you have predicted everything. how many of these winning favs this week did you lay? |
|
By:
huntsmans close goes in
|
|
By:
never mind only 5.72
![]() |
|
By:
big or small I lay 'em all.
|
|
By:
nope lay 'em at below ISP if possible. Like I've always said. Lots of rules, but youre quite correct it about the cyclic nature of the races within known bounds and how it always returns to the mean.
|
|
By:
so you have had a bad week
you will obviously have a better spell sooner or later but it's hardly a great prediction you couldn't predict that 5.71 winner there just because of 4 losers on the spin ![]() |
|
By:
Ive had an awful week. but it due to get a lot better.
|
|
By:
you get pummelled during a spree of favs and then dont collect on all the ones that you lay as plenty wont go beneath the sp
can't think of anything worse |
|
By:
Not but I reckon the next one will lose.
|