dont know about the boom but the winner probably had a fair bit left, looked to be dossing in front and would still have won imo even if the second had took the last okay.
dont know about the boom but the winner probably had a fair bit left, looked to be dossing in front and would still have won imo even if the second had took the last okay.
Matt would be good for C4. He knows his stuff, can be controversial, asks questions people don't want to answer. He's as good a presenter as N Luck, would be a better ring reporter than Tanya or Lee, never claimed to be a tipster but must be better than Cunningham. Mick Fitz, Pershad, Ms Ramsden he's got fu ck all to beat. When you think about it you couldn't put together a more incompetent bunch other than Mcgrath whose very knowledgeable.
Matt would be good for C4. He knows his stuff, can be controversial, asks questions people don't want to answer.He's as good a presenter as N Luck, would be a better ring reporter than Tanya or Lee, never claimed to be a tipster but must be better th
He wants to be the next Thommo. He thinks he could be good at everything, given the chance. He wants to tip, he wants to be a judge, he has tried to to be a commentator, he has tried his hand at PR with the Tote. He is very good at what he does and should stick to it (in my 'umble opinion).
He wants to be the next Thommo. He thinks he could be good at everything, given the chance. He wants to tip, he wants to be a judge, he has tried to to be a commentator, he has tried his hand at PR with the Tote. He is very good at what he does and s
chapman has a big ego and a small brain.he is awful to listen to.why he constantly has to tell us that everything is only "his opinion" is beyond me.we know its your opinion matt as its you whos saying it you fool!!
chapman has a big ego and a small brain.he is awful to listen to.why he constantly has to tell us that everything is only "his opinion" is beyond me.we know its your opinion matt as its you whos saying it you fool!!