There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
god hes a rotten tipster
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 27
|
By:
Don't need to back at all nowdays.Job for life courtesy of RUK.In the ring at all the festivals all exes paid. Luvlee. Still, don't blame him. The fault is with the bosses at RUK.
|
|
By:
tips lots of short priced losers..........his occasional big price selection only beat the ambulance
|
|
By:
Agree though cardifff. He brings nothing to the table.
|
|
By:
Failed pro-punter, failed businessman, failed tipster - it says it all about this industry that he's still slurping the Bisto with the best of them...
|
|
By:
millhouse.......how did he make money punting...........he did at one time............i know he was connected with john best at the time........inside info
|
|
By:
think dave yates the guy from the sun mark howard are all rubbish as well...........the only one i ever like listening to is steve mellish
|
|
By:
they all made money in the early dys of betfair ,getting the rattler to places like southwell midweek,gettingb the inside info on the today,s and not today,s, and cleaned up on betfair, got together in big syndicates to chase big jackpots,placepots ,scoop 6 ,s
|
|
By:
he did like his jackpots and scoop6 rollovers..........how the hell he got them up is a mystery though
|
|
By:
Cardiff, I always think that anyone can be a pro-punter until the money runs out.
Though this industry must be the only one in the world where people with a proven track record of being totally incapable even of competence can get routinely paid for being an 'expert'... |
|
By:
nevo was reguarly on ruk 8,10 years ago saying its harder to make money now on betfair because all the mug money has gone,
ie people sat at home playing against nevo and co on track |
|
By:
to be fair he does mention his failed business in his introduction piece....think he says he tried to get borrow money to keep it going if i read it right .......so he must be low on funds
|
|
By:
Which begs the question,
Are there any professional backers out there anymore. Not fast pic guys or arbers or lay everything at 1.03 etc. Just people who study and make their living from placing wagers on a daily basis |
|
By:
A lot lower after last at ascot sat if we believe his adoration of r moore can't see how it can be beat he said, did he forget its horse race no good things in this game he should know better
|
|
By:
The thing is olddesperado is that the punting landscape has changed dramatically over the past 20yrs as you know. There are far more ways to nick or do a tenner nowdays aren't there. The punting lines are more blurred so you've got to use the approach that suits you best, haven't you?
|
|
By:
He must p!ss himself laughing getting paid for being absolutely useless
|
|
By:
dont get ruk now hows his breeding,progeny,system going,
the book says she should stay and sire says it gets ist season winners blah,blah it was embarrasing early doors this year listening to him |
|
By:
didn't he used to back multiple runners in each race? like 4/5 in 8 horse fields..
|
|
By:
The statistical approach is for anoraks. Nevison doesn't look remotely like an anorak.
|
|
By:
rmccarthy16
21 Jun 15 17:10 Joined: 08 Aug 11 | Topic/replies: 1,895 | Blogger: rmccarthy16's blog didn't he used to back multiple runners in each race? like 4/5 in 8 horse fields.. yes thats what he used to do after getting a pay off from the city then shout the loudest when he fell onto a big priced winner |
|
By:
he will be wearing one soon
 |
|
By:
Its a jungle out there
|
|
By:
zealot........youre names not dave.........is it??
|
|
By:
rmccarthy16 21 Jun 15 17:10
didn't he used to back multiple runners in each race? like 4/5 in 8 horse fields.. ---------------- Yes - So that approach did not require an immense amount of Form Study - simply because he was not trying to eliminate practically ALL of the field, in order to end up with a single selection. Just 'playing the prices' - with a scatter gun approach. Lay out, say, £800 in differing stakes at differing prices, in a race, to Return £1000, whichever of those that you had backed - wins £200, when you have the winner. Of course, if the race was won by a horse that you had NOT backed - then you would Lose the whole £800. |
|
By:
onlooker.........need a very very high strike rate........not a good method
|
|
By:
whats he on r.u.k for hes useless r.u.k love employing failed journalist failed trainer failed punters and r.u.k charge you for them every month
 |
|
By:
^ As has, apparently, been proven - by the thread subject.
 |
|
By:
^ my reply - to cardiff's post 18:09
|