Claims he interacts with anyone on Twitter providing they are not simply abusive. That's a lie. I had the temerity to disagree with him via Twitter, cordially, and was blocked.
Claims he interacts with anyone on Twitter providing they are not simply abusive. That's a lie. I had the temerity to disagree with him via Twitter, cordially, and was blocked.
rp wont bite a part of the hand that feeds it because they have small cujones.
if they did the right thing and shamed the bookies punters long term the game will make up more in profits...the rp would flourish and the bookies would have ti eat humble pie and advertise again.
problem with this country is individuals are not willing to put heir neck on the line.....well cant blame him really but you see the big problem..
rp wont bite a part of the hand that feeds it because they have small cujones.if they did the right thing and shamed the bookies punters long term the game will make up more in profits...the rp would flourish and the bookies would have ti eat humble
'Newspaper' that postures to be on the side of punters makes a cynical commercial decision not to print the truth about the bookmaking industry's discrimination of its readers, in what is nothing short of institutionalised misrepresentation, for as long as the advertising revenue keeps rolling in and its worthless bookmaker side salaried 'journalists' can still get all the bets on they want for themselves.
By the way, which bookmaker's hospitality box is Bruce currently sipping champagne, imo...
Barry, here's another side to that coin:'Newspaper' that postures to be on the side of punters makes a cynical commercial decision not to print the truth about the bookmaking industry's discrimination of its readers, in what is nothing short of insti