Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
12 May 15 09:25
Joined:
Date Joined: 08 Aug 07
| Topic/replies: 498 | Blogger: Paul Haigh - Total Respect's blog
I'm looking for opinions on when a quoted price could be considered "materially different" from the general market price.

Should it be a percentage deviation from the general price - for example 25% either way?
Pause Switch to Standard View When does a price become "materially...
Show More
Loading...
Report Pythagoras May 12, 2015 10:05 AM BST
Its not as easy as a percentage. Depends how high profile the market, how long the discrepancy has been there, how many firms are quoting and who they are, how big the odds are (200's instead of 100's is 50% less chance but no big deal, 2's instead of evens is 17% less chance but a very big deal)etc. I've had this with IBAS before now and IMO they ridiculously adjudicated that 11/4 on a draw on which lots of firms were 9/4 and 12/5 was materially out!
Report Breedingmad May 12, 2015 10:22 AM BST
We are living in a material world ...No I'm a bloke..
Report maxheadroom May 12, 2015 10:45 AM BST
can palpable errors it be figured out from the book percentage?
Report parispike May 12, 2015 11:17 AM BST
When the selection wins!
Report dave1357 May 12, 2015 12:23 PM BST

May 12, 2015 -- 10:45AM, maxheadroom wrote:


can palpable errors it be figured out from the book percentage?


yeah def this - a genuine error with one price should lead to a much lower over-round than is normal for the book.

Report Paul Haigh - Total Respect May 12, 2015 3:03 PM BST
test
Report duncan idaho May 12, 2015 3:06 PM BST
'When does a price become "materially different"'


think it's about 12.30pm
Report parispike May 12, 2015 3:06 PM BST
To be serious I think dave has it right.
Report Paul Haigh - Total Respect May 12, 2015 3:09 PM BST
The ironic thing about this is that the case involves a firm who are out on their own at being under the general market price.

If they are claiming the right to correct prices which are "materially different" from the general market price in that they are "obvious errors", it only seems right that anyone who takes one of their shockingly bad early prices without BOG should in effect be able to claim that this price was clearly an "obvious error " too.

No doubt they will wait until they receive the court papers before coughing up as usual.
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com