There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
1.16 looks fair to me..
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 25
|
By:
how could they reverse that result?
|
|
By:
was a neck clear
|
|
By:
1.16 looks fair to me..
 |
|
By:
Will stand ffs.
Should be more like 1.05. |
|
By:
Did Somerby finish 4th can anyone confirm?
|
|
By:
why isn't it 1.05 though,typical i've backed it
|
|
By:
well tom if u backed it lay off at 1.16
|
|
By:
ResultStands
Weighed In |
|
By:
backed the 2nd @ 10's ended up giving a bit back,tar
|
|
By:
crazy that winner went to 1.2 in that stewards
|
|
By:
I'm still waiting to see if Somerby finished in 4th place.... i was listening to the clowns on the RP app and according to them it did finish 4th.... i went for a 1,2,3,4 place bet so fingers crossed!!
|
|
By:
finally settled! a 4th place winner for me with somerby... thank god!
|
|
By:
Wins by a neck so it'll take a hell of a lot more than an accidental whack across the nose to get that reversed.
|
|
By:
wasnt just that..winner went 2yds right 100yds out and sl hmp 2nd
|
|
By:
http://media.britishhorseracing.com/pdf/stewardsreport/?parace=579083
Nothing to report?? |
|
By:
check back a bit later
|
|
By:
ironically (for the whip issue complainants) he had whip in correct hand throughout, if he didn't he would have had more case to answer.
|
|
By:
The Stewards held an enquiry under Rule (B)11.6 into possible interference on the run to the line. Having
heard their evidence and viewed recordings of the race they found that the winner, MAC LE COUTEAU, ridden by Adam Wedge, had interfered with CHARMING LAD (IRE), placed second, ridden by Mr Danny Burton, in that he had twice hit CHARMING LAD (IRE) over the nose with his whip. They considered that the interference had not improved MAC LE COUTEAU’s placing in that CHARMING LAD (IRE) did not lose significant momentum as a result and MAC LE COUTEAU appeared to be holding him at the line, where the winning distance was a neck. They therefore ordered the placings to remain unaltered. The Stewards found Wedge in breach of Rule (B)54.1 and guilty of careless riding. They suspended him for 1 day as follows: Thursday 30 April 2015. |
|
By:
Always debateable whether the whip would be classed careless, but reversing places seemed 1.0001 that could be done.
|
|
By:
*not be done
|
|
By:
Different jockey, different result. (nap)
|
|
By:
The stewards are useless turds, they probably sit in the office all afternoon fingering their do nuts thinking they are important
|
|
By:
Had no interest in race and could not be overturned on the rules as it stands,but I think there should be a rule change to include deliberate whip interference as I think this was penalty would be automatic place reversal.
|
|
By:
i dont think the whip incident would effect the result but the winner moved a couple of yards to its right causing slight interference `00yds out
|
|
By:
100*
|