didnt look like a severe swerve like he didnt have hands on reign and accepted it this does not happen often........ well not to the really top jocks.......
didnt look like a severe swervelike he didnt have hands on reign and accepted it this does not happen often........well not to the really top jocks.......
not often im lost for words but this puzzled... it certainly didnt look a tricky ride during race going wide throughout...... never swerving...... strange one.......
not often im lost for wordsbut this puzzled...it certainly didnt look a tricky ride during race going wide throughout......never swerving......strange one.......
just read lapsys comment im actually a bookmaker who uses betfair generally for edging purposes i didn't have a penny on the horse just making the point of the drift to 9/1 on the off when he was trading 5.5 20 mins earlier, as for the stewards report they will take the jockeys word that the horse ducked out and there was nothing he could do
just read lapsys comment im actually a bookmaker who uses betfair generally for edging purposesi didn't have a penny on the horse just making the point of the drift to 9/1 on the offwhen he was trading 5.5 20 mins earlier, as for the stewards report
Read that 15.22 post Rewired, the undertone of racism is there. Of course the stewards will ask for an explanation,i don't care what you think of me rewired but that post was wrong on a few levels.
Read that 15.22 post Rewired, the undertone of racism is there. Of course the stewards will ask for an explanation,i don't care what you think of me rewired but that post was wrong on a few levels.
your a complete idiot generalizing people who use a betting shop as said-your words this was my post.....
didnt look like a severe swerve like he didnt have hands on reign and accepted it this does not happen often........ well not to the really top jocks....... what is wrong with that......just my opinion...jockey didnt look like he was concentrating you really need to take a look at yourself.............
your a complete idiotgeneralizing people who use a betting shop as said-your wordsthis was my post.....didnt look like a severe swervelike he didnt have hands on reign and accepted itthis does not happen often........well not to the really top jocks
It is you are or you're, not your,basic English. My issue was the portrayal of Irish racing in the 15.22 post in the use of "then again it is Ireland".
It is you are or you're, not your,basic English.My issue was the portrayal of Irish racing in the 15.22 post in the use of "then again it is Ireland".
"then again it is Ireland" is an observation which draws on a perception of the way the sport in Ireland is run. It may be ill informed, based on weak generalization and may even be considered ignorant, (then again it may not). What it absolutely is not, is racist. To make an analogy, if someone commented on a questionable decision by FIFA and that drew the comment "then again it is FIFA" - would that be racist? Of course not. It's a comment based on a reputation which in turn is based on experience, whether or not justified. Making that comment shows you to be guilty of using reactionary laziness to make an accusation of reactionary laziness. As for Treacy, only he knows what happened. It cost me dearly - ad that's not speculation!
"then again it is Ireland" is an observation which draws on a perception of the way the sport in Ireland is run. It may be ill informed, based on weak generalization and may even be considered ignorant, (then again it may not). What it absolutely is