Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
You couldn't make it up.
Show More
Going to be pretty tough listening for some of us.
Evens money. Dave Nev nodds off.
Evens money. Dave Nev nodds off.
Interesting stuff, but I wish he'd get off the treadmill
bit worried that the prof might not make it to the end of the interview...
His theorem is follows:
The Vaughan Williams Possibility Theorem
If something might or might not exist, but is unobservable, it is more likely to exist than something which can be observed, with any positive probability, but is not observed. If something might or might not exist, it is more likely to exist if it is less likely to be observed and is not observed than something else which is more likely to be observed, and is not observed.
The Vaughan Williams Possibility Theorem
If something might or might not exist, but is unobservable, it is more likely to exist than something which can be observed, with any positive probability, but is not observed. If something might or might not exist, it is more likely to exist if it is less likely to be observed and is not observed than something else which is more likely to be observed, and is not observed.
he's a dead ringer for a spruced up version of Colin from the Brittas Empire back in the day...
Can you spot "the signal" That is the question and also the answer.
geof m - I think the Prof meant.
If my Aunt had a pair of bollocks - Then she would be my Uncle. - or ...
In the Profs case ............ COULD be my Uncle.
If my Aunt had a pair of bollocks - Then she would be my Uncle. - or ...
In the Profs case ............ COULD be my Uncle.
"It's a difficult topic for the layman "
What a pompous coont
What a pompous coont
It's just occurred to me that Nevison's contribution has been, er, zero!
Is he being paid by the word? - hope so.
Is he being paid by the word? - hope so.
To be fair his last words before the off were "you can't lay Gold Flash".
All these stats and figures etc but the two of them done their money when betting for a living.
The fact that the pair of them stopped betting and returned to the cosy ruk studio with their tails between their legs tells you all you need to know about the sheit they are spouting
The fact that the pair of them stopped betting and returned to the cosy ruk studio with their tails between their legs tells you all you need to know about the sheit they are spouting
never heard anyone talking so much bu..ocks as him about tickets
Reminds me of those "Open University" programmes on BBC2.
I don't mind listening to them - nice contrast between the intellectual and the anecdotal.
I'm not entirely sure the spreadsheet totally supported the theory that the market is more efficient than ever though (not saying it is n't, just that the data they presented did n't support the statement).
I'm not entirely sure the spreadsheet totally supported the theory that the market is more efficient than ever though (not saying it is n't, just that the data they presented did n't support the statement).
Dave seems ok in the fact he is basically saying/admitting he doesn't win anymore (I think)
The other one talks like he has the Golden goose
The other one talks like he has the Golden goose
now hes saying punters dont want to win how does he get airtime
If you are serious about betting you can only find this fascinating.
Nevo one of the World's Top PRO Gamblers acc. to the internet
Betting Professionals
1 Alan Woods
2 Patrick Veitch
3 Dave Nevison
4 Andrew Beyer
5 Zeljko Ranogajec
6 William Benter
http://thegreattipoff.com/betting-professionals/William-Benter
Betting Professionals
1 Alan Woods
2 Patrick Veitch
3 Dave Nevison
4 Andrew Beyer
5 Zeljko Ranogajec
6 William Benter
http://thegreattipoff.com/betting-professionals/William-Benter
Dec 10, 2014 -- 5:04PM, the.mad.dog.man wrote:
now hes saying punters dont want to win how does he get airtime
and he is correct
What on earth are these people talking about? Are they from a different planet?
windsor__boy 10 Dec 14 17:05 Joined: 01 Oct 10 | Topic/replies: 183 | Blogger: windsor__boy's blog
If you are serious about betting you can only find this fascinating.
If you are serious about betting you can only find this fascinating.
Pretty sure Jodami drifted cos of the Good-to-Firm ground, Nevo
Dec 10, 2014 -- 5:09PM, the.mad.dog.man wrote:
dave1357 are you related to the clown
nice idiotic comment well done have a dog biscuit
why has Nevison never set himself up as a bookie?.
he is boring me.....
he is boring me.....
Add on it was trained by a guy that didn't have good horses/winners and they had never heard of him.
as for jodami, it was a championship race, if you dont go with your "gut" in those races
when would you?
when would you?
as for jodami, it was a championship race, if you dont go with your "gut" in those races
when would you?
when would you?
Aber , yes it was not just a bad example it was an appalling one.
Thought Dave Nevison made some interesting points there regarding the longevity of the winning punter.
His remark that the bookies will have to become better at advertising the winners as the market becomes super efficient was quite forward thinking.
I am slightly more optimistic than him that a few people on here can still have a decent run at this before walking away from the game and cashing in their pensions.
Ultimately though he is probably right and this is another example of the corporations winning.
The only way out is if we become like Hong Kong and have those pari mutual pools that prof LVW was talking about but that will never happen here because the big bookies will have MPs lobbying against that. Oh well only 20 yrs till the pension
His remark that the bookies will have to become better at advertising the winners as the market becomes super efficient was quite forward thinking.
I am slightly more optimistic than him that a few people on here can still have a decent run at this before walking away from the game and cashing in their pensions.
Ultimately though he is probably right and this is another example of the corporations winning.
The only way out is if we become like Hong Kong and have those pari mutual pools that prof LVW was talking about but that will never happen here because the big bookies will have MPs lobbying against that. Oh well only 20 yrs till the pension
Willow is baffling Nevison here 
Along with everyone else
Along with everyone else
The problem with Willo is it's all theory, he never puts into practise. I suspect he would be unsuccessful and skint if he did.
You can almost see the clouds, dancing girls etc floating around in Angus' head.
Gamblers Anonymous should book the guest professor and Willo to give taks at their meetings. All that excitement drowned with boredom at one fell swoop.
Nevo floundering here , clearly gone at the game , Willoughby on a different planet , need to get a proper pro punter on to cut thru all this rubbish
I am watching The Chase as I cannot stand either of them.
A 60 grand handicap and they're waffling on about this rubbish.
Dave said he rarely bets now, that he has spent the last 7 months studying 6,500 systems that he has come across.....to sort out which ones are profitable.
His old system which he mentioned LIVE on RUK on the 5th April 2008 was to put sellotape on the LAY button every time Jomus ran, that the horse never wins came undone, when Jomus romped in at 9/1............
His old system which he mentioned LIVE on RUK on the 5th April 2008 was to put sellotape on the LAY button every time Jomus ran, that the horse never wins came undone, when Jomus romped in at 9/1............
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539