|
By:
I think the FPTP will get thrown out. Laying it in the Stewards
|
|
By:
I think the FPTP will get thrown out. Laying it in the Stewards
|
|
By:
I agree with 'Fluke', think they will take the conditions into consideration.
|
|
By:
whats the result please
|
|
By:
But gl with your lay, Kriskin. Not a strong view here.
|
|
By:
stewards still ongoing
|
|
By:
layed chance to dance heavy
|
|
By:
Got chucked in the odds just before the suspend are anything to go by, 1.01 I saw.
![]() |
|
By:
The conditions are (or should be) irrelevant according to the rules.
Even if interference is accidental it is,under the rules,still interference. The stewards are milking this for as long as they can! |
|
By:
*if
|
|
By:
last price laid 1.01 stinks
|
|
By:
Disqualified
|
|
By:
result please
|
|
By:
Last price matched 1.01 on the 2nd past post
![]() |
|
By:
Excellent shout, Kriskin.
|
|
By:
THe stewards had to be consistent. Was only one out come in my view
|
|
By:
George - I layed a good chunk at 1.34 when the market re-opened for the Inquiry
|
|
By:
That's the problem with Irish stewards, they never are consistent.
|
|
By:
Those making the decisions are making more than just that. No doubt in my mind.
|
|
By:
The Irish Rules are the very worst of both Worlds,imo.
In England & France you know exactly where you stand. Over there it is an absolute lottery. |
|
By:
Wes - they have been consistent recently. The last 5 similiar incidents all got chucked out.
The 1.01 backer must have been in the room with the stewards 1.01 £7,142 1.02 £434 1.03 £62 1.04 £8 1.05 £456 1.06 £40 |
|
By:
i would not have been shocked with either result
but i don’t feel there consistent but maybe they are.... |
|
By:
probably fated when meercat tipped it up
|
|
By:
the 1.01 must have been the steward
|
|
By:
Surprised BF settled the mkt so quickly given the hoovering that went on when the result was known.
|
|
By:
DISGRACE, legalised theft
![]() |
|
By:
"the 1.01 must have been the steward"
A Village is missing its Idiot ![]() |