There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
No point in having stewards
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 18
|
By:
will be thrown out
|
|
By:
ramping fred, yep ...
|
|
By:
Cannoned him only beat him a shd and 2nd was game and coming back
|
|
By:
Presume you guys are snapping up all the 5.3 on here then
|
|
By:
Hope u are correct I've laid the first past the post.
|
|
By:
head not a shd
|
|
By:
Only imo rothman he nearly knocked him over clear contact cant see how he can keep it
|
|
By:
Never saw it but betting against original winners not good
|
|
By:
Shokking decision
|
|
By:
hd queen bee not sht hd - - poss made the difference ...
|
|
By:
Needs to be a death for one to get race these days
|
|
By:
Queen Bee, you know this , and people still bet the runner-up
 |
|
By:
As I keep saying, with the first past the post it very rarely gets changed, scrap first past the post I say, or just tell the bookmakers to pi ss off, we all know its the bookmakers who constantly get the rub of the green in regards to these enquiries, change the result its 2 pay outs and we wouldn't want the bookies going short would we.
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
The rules in this country are a joke. This bollox about being more than a nose doesn't stand-up. So u can put a horse and jockey over the rail and if u beat that oponent by more than a nose u keep the race. A farce
|
|
By:
Dont happen in America, Kris
|
|
By:
No ban for winning jockey and keeps race amazing really
|
|
By:
RM - the US rules are much clearer to everyone involved in 99% of the scenarios
|