It's a racing forum , he puts up a selection most days, and people have the option of reading what he says or ignoring it.
It was 4/1 last night and its absolutely hosed up. Struggling to see why that merits abuse.
I'd have thought it was obvious.It's a racing forum , he puts up a selection most days, and people have the option of reading what he says or ignoring it.It was 4/1 last night and its absolutely hosed up. Struggling to see why that merits abuse.
Your assumption, and that's all it is, an assumption, is that him putting up a selection on here in itself will cause a price to markedly shorten. That doesnt happen on a daily basis and a fair few of the horses he puts up drift in the betting.
At the end of the day people are only going to act on his comment and back his selections if he has a track record of putting up winners.
And if he is putting up winners, and showing a level stakes profit, Im struggling to see how that makes him either ignorant or a muppet, given its more than the vast majority on her manage.
I take his selections into consideration because he appears to be a good judge, and there is usually a sound basis on the form book for him putting up what he puts up. Like I said if you dont like it, just ignore it.
It doesn't help in the slightest. Your assumption, and that's all it is, an assumption, is that him putting up a selection on here in itself will cause a price to markedly shorten. That doesnt happen on a daily basis and a fair few of the horses he p
I take his selections into consideration because he appears to be a good judge, and there is usually a sound basis on the form book for him putting up what he puts up.
Hey what
I take his selections into consideration because he appears to be a good judge, and there is usually a sound basis on the form book for him putting up what he puts up.Hey what