There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
I backed lord of the drums in the 8.35 Perth this evening. There was 6 runners and 1 non runner (polarbrook) when I backed him about 5pm. I look at the result now and polarbrook won beating my guy by 3L. Doesn't really seem fair I might not have backed drums of I had of known polar was in the race??
surely this cant be correct .. bet should of been void at least .. bet was placed with sporting bet !!
any help is appreciated
Thanks
surely this cant be correct .. bet should of been void at least .. bet was placed with sporting bet !!
any help is appreciated
Thanks
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 3
|
By:
You surely have a case if Sporting bet did not have the horse down as a runner when you placed your bet. You could obviously NOT have backed the winner!
|
|
By:
they put the 131 back in my account eg 50 single on raithlin because it was a double and I'm ringing there manager tomorow to discuss the issue further and any advice on it?
does this not prove im correct |
|
By:
they should void 100% if winner not in the market
|