Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
xmoneyx
29 May 13 03:26
Joined:
Date Joined: 12 Jul 11
| Topic/replies: 59,911 | Blogger: xmoneyx's blog
a patent costs 75% more,so a single win needs to be 6/1

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 12
By:
Ramruma
When: 29 May 13 05:40
The two big problems with both trixie and patent are firstly that the stake is the same for singles, doubles and treble, even though probabilities and edges are different, and secondly that each-way or win-only is the same across the bet.

Actually, there is a third problem. Too often punters, instead of thinking, I've found three live horses so I'll combine them in a patent, do it the wrong way round: I want to do a patent and therefore I need to find three horses.
By:
xmoneyx
When: 29 May 13 10:22
so your saying stake it diff with singles,doubles,trebles

1.5 pts single= 4.50
.75 pts double=2.25
.25 treble= .25

7pts
By:
xmoneyx
When: 29 May 13 10:22
so your saying stake it diff with singles,doubles,trebles

1.5 pts single= 4.50
.75 pts double=2.25
.25 treble= .25

7pts
By:
Ramruma
When: 29 May 13 10:34
Yes, although there are seven different bets there and ideally you should treat each one on its merits. If one of the singles is odds-on in a three-horse conditions race and another is 16/1 in a 27-runner handicap, for instance.

Unless there is a good reason -- eg generous bonuses -- start with the horses, not the bets.
By:
xmoneyx
When: 29 May 13 10:36
what if all are around 3/1
By:
johnnywilkinson
When: 29 May 13 10:49
THAT TRIXIE DOES A BLINDING JOB IN ANGELS IN YARMOUTH
By:
thearchmeister
When: 29 May 13 10:50
If I can not be bothered working out the merits of the particular bet I blindly do an equally divided trixie
By:
qqking.
When: 29 May 13 12:09
Isn't it better to add another selection  for a lucky 15 and get triple odds one winner with baldfred?
By:
xmoneyx
When: 29 May 13 12:14
no triple odds bookies where I stay

Scotbet ditched 3x two years ago Silly
By:
swift-tuttle
When: 29 May 13 12:18
What this boils down to imo is the value inherent in multiple bets for layers.

OP doesn't give the choice to have 3 singles only - that would be the best value. The choice is between two multiple bets, one with added singles.

I refer to my bible 'The Art of Legging' to resolve questions like these and that sets me firmly against multiples from a punter point of view
By:
durose13
When: 29 May 13 12:36
i agree mt tuttle
By:
thearchmeister
When: 29 May 13 12:51
only problem in refraining from multiples is the few times they all win
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com