Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
unbiased
02 May 13 13:43
Joined:
Date Joined: 04 Feb 03
| Topic/replies: 5,858 | Blogger: unbiased's blog
It is strange that she was administered a course of steroids so close to the 1,000gns,as MAZ would surely have known that had she won,and she is a class filly,that she would test positive in post race tests.Every trainer knows that medication stays in the bloodstream for a period of time,so it is very odd that she was on steroids so close to the race.
  She was top notch as a 2yo,so you ask yourself why she needed a course of steroids in the first place,unless she wintered badly,and didn't make the normal improvement in physique from 2-3.
Surely he would have said to himself  ,such and such a date is the deadline for use,so that her blood is clean,and would pass any forthcoming blood test.
   Some things just don't add up.
Pause • Switch to Standard View Questions concerning Certify
Show More
Loading...
Report BJG • May 2, 2013 1:45 PM BST
She was top notch as a 2yo,so you ask yourself why she needed a course of steroids in the first place,unless she wintered badly,and didn't make the normal improvement in physique from 2-3.


Maybe she was on the steroids too last year Confused
Report unbiased • May 2, 2013 1:47 PM BST
No,she would have been routine tested at least once,having won a few races.
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com