Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Anaglogs Daughter
02 May 13 11:49
Joined:
Date Joined: 05 Jan 10
| Topic/replies: 29,477 | Blogger: Anaglogs Daughter's blog
by Alan McGuinness
http://www.kentonline.co.uk/medway_messenger/news/2013/may/2/gambling_code_meeting_date_set.aspx


A voluntary code on gambling designed to protect problem gamblers could be agreed this week.

Betting and gaming shops will hold talks with the council on Wednesday (May 8) with the aim of coming to an agreement, which would be one of the first of its kind in the country.

The Association of British Bookmakers, the industry body, will also be at the discussions.

The code is part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of people in the Towns getting into debt.

It follows concerns about the use of Fixed Odds Betting Terminals, which allow users to bet on the outcome of various games and events, including bingo and horse racing.

Community safety boss Cllr Mike O’Brien (Con) said: "This is aimed primarily at protecting the vulnerable in society, we’re not trying to put the betting shops out of business.

"I want to come out of that meeting with an agreement."

In January members of all political parties met with the Gambling Commission and agreed a voluntary code would be the most effective way to reduce the risk of people getting into debt.

Since then the council has been researching the best way forward, including the approach followed by other local authorities across the UK.

A radio scheme operated by the Safer Medway Partnership could provide a template for the gambling code.

Under this, businesses are able to share information, including photographs, of people barred from entering shops and restaurants after committing a criminal offence or causing a nuisance.

This could be extended to betting and gaming shops, preventing customers with problem habits from feeding their addiction
Pause • Switch to Standard View Medway Council gambling code meeting...
Show More
Loading...
Report clive82 • May 2, 2013 12:20 PM BST
Operators are already required to protect the vulnerable as a condition of having a licence. If the council has evidence they are not abiding by their licence why not remove them. What does a 'voluntary code' achieve beyond favourable headlines for the council? If there is evidence then they are failing to meet their responsibilities, if there is not they are wasting everyone's time and being dishonest towards the electorate.
Report rcing • May 2, 2013 12:25 PM BST
clive , what type of person would come under the title " vulnerable " ?
Report clive82 • May 2, 2013 1:10 PM BST
Not neccesarily my description but the accepted groups would be under 18s and problem gamblers.
Report rcing • May 2, 2013 1:21 PM BST
you would be very naive to believe that betting shop managers or area managers would/do anything regarding problem gamblers ( 99% of managers wont don anything )
Report clive82 • May 2, 2013 1:26 PM BST
If that is correct Rcing, then presumably you agree that a further voluntary code is nothing more then a PR stunt by Medway council.
Report rcing • May 2, 2013 2:07 PM BST
yes clive , it wont change anything .
Report Anaglogs Daughter • May 2, 2013 2:15 PM BST
clive82     02 May 13 13:26 
If that is correct Rcing, then presumably you agree that a further voluntary code is nothing more then a PR stunt by Medway counciL.


I think you'll find clive that there is no empirical evidence that this is a PR stunt.
Report Dr Gonzo • May 2, 2013 2:29 PM BST
Laugh
Report clive82 • May 2, 2013 2:36 PM BST
"Somebody should be done about the proliferation of political gimmicks and the targeting of vulnerable voters by elected representatives" - Derek Pleb, Campaign for fairer electioneering spokesman.
Report Dr Gonzo • May 2, 2013 4:14 PM BST


"What's that Skippy? Someone is criticising bookmakers on the Betfair forum?!"
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com