No not paying the 16k they have arranged to come to take it away next week, if I miss the appointment they want £82
They have doubled the price, slowed the pictures have less tracks than ever and it's going to go up again in january,I'll pass
john92No not paying the 16k they have arranged to come to take it away next week, if I miss the appointment they want £82 They have doubled the price, slowed the pictures have less tracks than ever and it's going to go up again in january,I'll pass
I write to confirm that SIS will be attending the above site to carry out the removal of the SIS equipment on Wednesday 08th May at 10:30am.
Please can you confirm that this date is convenient?
Should this date not be suitable, please ensure that you notify us a minimum 48 hours in advance.
As you will appreciate, engineering resource and travel time is costly and failure to do so may incur an abortive visit charge of £82.00 + vat.
I write to confirm that SIS will be attending the above site to carry out the removal of the SIS equipment on Wednesday 08th May at 10:30am. Please can you confirm that this date is convenient? Should this date not be suitable, please ensure that you
Its such an odious situation (the degradation of product during ridiculous inflation of price) that it cant surely be down to incompetence. They must not want (or need?) a certain type of customer, if that is the case fair enough, but dont ever let it be said that SiS have the racing public's interest at heart when the only 2 options they allow now is a product that vastly outprices customers or a delayed free one.
Its such an odious situation (the degradation of product during ridiculous inflation of price) that it cant surely be down to incompetence.They must not want (or need?) a certain type of customer, if that is the case fair enough, but dont ever let it
Well I was letting the dog have a bone. You are correct tho, even free ain't free I was generalising for the individuals who decree ruk/turf as being bad for racing and for some reason the broken monopoly of sis being good for racing as their interests of 'possibly betting' before a race has more importance to racing than the people looking to 'actually bet' during most races.
Well I was letting the dog have a bone. You are correct tho, even free ain't freeI was generalising for the individuals who decree ruk/turf as being bad for racing and for some reason the broken monopoly of sis being good for racing as their interest
was told yesterday that they are discontinuing Millersfield and Brushwood, seems it will only be virtual horseracing, but its the entire service package, 16k for everything its your entire platform for the shops
was told yesterday that they are discontinuing Millersfield and Brushwood, seems it will only be virtual horseracing, but its the entire service package, 16k for everything its your entire platform for the shops