









.......they can use whatever drugs they want.
Apr 23, 2013 -- 11:28PM, spyker wrote:
Serious question SC
Apr 24, 2013 -- 6:14AM, Lets Elope wrote:
Imbeciles, it's because your racing and trainers are still back in the dark ages and your stakes on offer and the overall pitiful state of your called racing industry accurately reflects that.If steroids are administered in training they're not clear of their system and will be detected. There is nothing wrong with properly administered not abused use of steroids, doctors administer them to people to aid recovery from and accelerate healing of injuries in people. What's wrong with the proper administration of it to horses while spelling as it aids their development and accelerates the healing process and recovery from the rigours of a racing preparation and aids the horses overall development and enables the trainer to get the best out of the horse which in turn aids the owners chances of getting a return upon their investment.Proper use benefits the horse and doesn't harm the animal but it seems you lot would rather live in the dark ages and abuse your horses rather than help them, nobody advocates drugs in competition and our testing regime is probably the most rigourous in the world.
Please LE. You don't really think these guys can read past "Drug cheats" do you? They don't have the capacity to provide any thought into anything.






....wtf...... absolutely clueless.Apr 24, 2013 -- 8:48AM, J.R.Hartley wrote:
....wtf...... absolutely clueless.A system that allows steroid use as long as they are clear by race day is pointless.....why bother banning them at all.If a trainer were to give a horse a steroid on race day itself it would back no difference to the horses performance.As i said earlier the benefits of a steroid are reaped long before race day.....Lance Armstrong along with nearly every drug cheat were clean on race day.
Pretty sure he used masking agents and backdated documents. Just because he was "clean" on race day doesn't mean he was clean on race day.
Show us the science that says you know more than those in charge. Maybe you do, but you have said nothing to prove it yet.
As for BC. If all you can do is point the finger at others in light of the most influential stable on the planet, EVER, being caught red handed, then pity you.....


Apr 24, 2013 -- 9:17AM, spyker wrote:
I don't doubt this thread was started with a bit of tongue in the cheek and surprise surprise the usual suspects turn up and defend everything Australian (fish in barrel?) but honestly possums, you genuniely se nothing at all wrong with your rules? If our rules were as yours and yours as ours there would be no end of abuse from you lot about our 'drugged up horses'. I take it it is acceptable for human athletes to take steroids out of competition as well and as they don't affect performance on raceday (thanks for that BJT) and you have no objection to Aussie sports people taking steroids out of competition?Obv Aussies can't call Godolphin drug cheats as what they have done is not in anyway illegal in Aus and prob goes on all the time by what LE has said., safe in the knowledge that they aren't going to test a horse if it isn't entered in any race - yep def a level playing field!
What goes on here is irrelevant. The issue, is Godolphin not playing by the rules. If the rules are different here and everybody is playing by them, that has nothing to do with Godolphin cheating in the UK.
If I bought up team racing (ie pacemakers, horses running dead, millions of pounds a week lost on horses running dead), and the fraud, cheating going on in UK racing, what would be your response?
It certainly isn't allowed here, but you ignorant "morons" will defend it to the death.
Fact is we have rules in place, based on our drug testing regime. You have stricter rules in place, and have obviously just started drug testing.
To suggest that we are cheats is crazy, as we regulate what goes on here, whereas you don't allow it but have ZERO fcuking idea what is happening.
Heads in the sand.





....never mind you did your best.

Apr 24, 2013 -- 11:30AM, J.R.Hartley wrote:
Not so easy to defend the indefensible is it BJ?.........never mind you did your best.I see Coming Second is back in better spirit after his pitiful capitulation last night.........Well done lads you did your steroid munching country proud....
Not sure what you are on about though. less than 3% of your horses are drug tested. How in hell would you have any idea what goes on? 

11/45 have been tested there, and found guilty. The trainer also admitted to at least another 5, but they are ok, because they didn't test them so no case to answer.....
WANK WANK......
Apr 24, 2013 -- 11:30AM, J.R.Hartley wrote:
Not so easy to defend the indefensible is it BJ?.........never mind you did your best.I see Coming Second is back in better spirit after his pitiful capitulation last night.........Well done lads you did your steroid munching country proud....
so that 1 article is enough for you to name Aussies as "steroid munching", you classless individual, wow your parents must be absolutely proud of you, your integrity is similar to that of those guys who tried to blow up Boston, speaking of blowing things up, if your brain cells represented explosives you wouldn't have enough to blow your own fkn nose 

Well done on reversing my name to try and turn it into an insult, if you were the first to do it I would send you a congratulatory private message, you've probably realized by now there is no PM waiting for you, so in actual fact you should feel ****g ashamed.
I eagerly anticipate your boring reply 