Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
GEORGE.B
16 Apr 13 08:10
Joined:
Date Joined: 14 Jul 04
| Topic/replies: 66,492 | Blogger: GEORGE.B's blog
McInnes is accused of running Commando Scott 9 times in 2009 despite knowing the horse had undergone de-nerving surgery the previous year.
McInnes is also charged with failing to conduct his business with reasonable care and attempting to mislead a BHA investigator.
Owner William Morris has also been charged with misleading investigators.

After leaving McInnes, Commando Scott was trained by Declan Carroll (for who the horse won twice). The BHA investigation established Carroll was unaware of the horse's previous medical history, and he has been absolved of any responsibility and does not face any charges.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 14
By:
ged
When: 16 Apr 13 09:46
So presumably it's not a crime to have the de-nerving surgery carried out, but is a crime to run a horse knowing that it's been carried out.?
By:
Dr Gonzo
When: 16 Apr 13 09:59
Believe that is correct ged - horses that has had a neurectomy is specifically prohibited from running.
By:
miss.wales
When: 16 Apr 13 10:12
Wasn't this Howard Johnson's main misdemeanour?
By:
GEORGE.B
When: 16 Apr 13 10:25
Johnson was warned off for 3 years after been found guilty of running Striking Article following a neurectomy.
By:
wee eck
When: 16 Apr 13 11:33
GEORGE, Hojo's suspension was a severe blow to horseracing in the North, a hefty and meaningful fine

would have been more appropiate, look where NH racing in the north is now with the loss of Hojo and Wyllie.
By:
hello :-)
When: 16 Apr 13 11:41
I imagine it was a blow to the northern racing scene wee eck , but there is no way on gods earth you can have someone running horses like that training , you cant weigh up punishment either by economics .

Trainers who run animals in that state should be jailed

Same for all
By:
GEORGE.B
When: 16 Apr 13 11:42
wee eck, he also recieved a further ban for drug offences - do you think they should have just given him 'a slap on the wrist' for that too?

How much should a "hefty and meaningful fine" been iyo to someone as wealthy as Johnson?
By:
wee eck
When: 16 Apr 13 11:48
I guarantee you guys this, most trainers in the North would prefer Hojo and Wyllie

still in business up here they were good for the game. George a big enough financial

penalty would have hurt Hojo and probably would have been beneficial to the game overall.
By:
elise
When: 16 Apr 13 11:56
i'll grant you they miss hojo spending wylies cash
By:
GEORGE.B
When: 16 Apr 13 11:57
*received

wee eck, do you think HoJo and Wylie will set up again once his ban ends?
By:
hello :-)
When: 16 Apr 13 11:59
Very big loss no doubt about that he cost the northern racing scene a lot , what he did was horrifying and to the wider public tarnished racing a great deal

Only one person to blame for that though and deserved all he got
By:
wee eck
When: 16 Apr 13 11:59
elise, Wyllie did not give a monkey's about how much Hojo spent as long as he got be winner or two

at the big Cheltenham meeting
By:
elise
When: 16 Apr 13 12:00
that was my point wee eck in relation to your comment about him being good for the n east
By:
wee eck
When: 16 Apr 13 12:02
GEORGE, Definitely no, all over Hojo is enjoying pottering around his farms and

it seems that Wyllie is fully occupied in his new venture at Close House a golf

and hotel complex a few miles from Newcastle.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com