Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
differentdrum
17 Mar 13 11:02
Joined:
Date Joined: 05 Oct 11
| Topic/replies: 21,186 | Blogger: differentdrum's blog
Just a quote from today's column talking about Cheltenham:-

'Furthermore, it has become ridiculously difficult to make any money if you're value-oriented punter.'

Perhaps you should just stop making excuses and explain to the editor that you are just not up to the job.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 26
By:
dod
When: 17 Mar 13 11:05
Was he referring to himself?
By:
Diamond_Joe_Quimby
When: 17 Mar 13 11:12
He made 2450 to stakes advised at Cheltenham.
By:
Diamond_Joe_Quimby
When: 17 Mar 13 11:29
according to tipsterform
By:
johnwayne
When: 17 Mar 13 11:35
i agree with his summing up of cheltenham.
By:
silvergreaser
When: 17 Mar 13 11:37
seemed fairly fond of tipping horses from rogue stables at Cheltenham like Byrnes, Elliot and O'Neill.
By:
Diamond_Joe_Quimby
When: 17 Mar 13 11:38
Good article today I thought. Not about the "Value" etc.... but about Cheltenham devouring the entire National Hunt season
By:
mange
When: 17 Mar 13 11:39
When I come up with the same as him Cry
By:
BlazingWalker
When: 17 Mar 13 13:18
Would like to know exactly what he is referring to. Is it the fact you cant get a bet on with the so called bookmakers or is it the prices are stingy in the first place.
By:
xmoneyx
When: 17 Mar 13 13:21
would be iconic if even he cant get decent odds
By:
fife
When: 17 Mar 13 13:24
differentdrum to suggest Segal is not up to the job is just stupid.
By:
loper
When: 17 Mar 13 13:26
You have to laugh if Pricewise with the pick of the prices, often an underround book and no limit to his bets, or closed accounts, moans about value!
By:
deadbrain59
When: 17 Mar 13 13:35
not many spotted beneficial 20/1,had one a grade 1 by 11 length.Whoops
By:
duncan idaho
When: 17 Mar 13 14:37
he showed a profit...more than most did
By:
mario999
When: 17 Mar 13 15:33
utter rubbish.....
even though he selected two winners..
he made a profit of nearly 2500 for 100 pound stakes...
mind he had two unlucky losers....
what else u need from
By:
mario999
When: 17 Mar 13 15:33
at BSP
By:
WFT
When: 17 Mar 13 16:06
I can vouch that he made a very small profit as starting price, and he doesn't do this very often, so I'm guessing he also did at bsp.
By:
differentdrum
When: 17 Mar 13 16:12
He describes his punting week as 'mostly useless'. His words, not mine.
By:
WFT
When: 17 Mar 13 16:19
I never understand all this hostility towards Tom Segal. People need to know the facts, and stop slagging him off because the bookmakers won't let you play on his selections.

I have records on over 80 regular tipsters, with some going back to 2007, and I use two prices, the one that was available when I became aware of the tip (i.e. not the one published), and the starting price. Tom comes easily clear on the first price, and way down the list on starting price. He is not responsible for the starting price. The bookmakers have made sure you can't win using starting price. They've done the same with Hugh Taylor and Gary O'Brien.

PS I don't back his tips very often.
By:
homefortea
When: 17 Mar 13 16:21
I had a good day yesterday -  made a profit of nearly £10 million pounds to £12 million pound stakes...
By:
1st time poster
When: 17 Mar 13 16:32
so on a big race on a saturday why would the punters pal segal put up the fav ,knowing the bookies would strangle the price ,meaning even if it won millions of saturday punters who backed it would actualy lose
By:
WFT
When: 17 Mar 13 16:38
I'm having difficulty in understanding how you can lose when it wins, no matter what the price ?

Enlighten me.
By:
1st time poster
When: 17 Mar 13 16:40
backing a 3 to 1 shot that should be 5 or 6,s means you lose in the long run,allegedly, it was a an early dec race so segal no,s more that anyone that any value in the horse had already been squeezed out of it or does he think he spotted something every punter and bookmaker hadnt spotted in the previous 48 hours
By:
WFT
When: 17 Mar 13 16:54
Ok, I think I see your logic, and agree, but judging a man on one tip is a bit extreme, especially as it's probably the only favourite he has put forward in a very long time.

His method is about looking for value, and there's plenty of value in backing a favourite that you still think is the wrong price.
By:
1st time poster
When: 17 Mar 13 16:56
not 48 hours after every other tipping line has had their mucky paws over it
By:
Tucho
When: 17 Mar 13 17:37
Don't understand what he's complaing about. He tipped Flaxen Flare at 25/1 and it returned an SP of 25/1. It returned BSP of 40 I think.

There is no other meeting around where he can tip a big priced horse and it won't be backed in much shorter than it's advised price. There is so much money floating around for Cheltenham that even Seagull's tips retain their value.
By:
Tucho
When: 17 Mar 13 17:37
*complaining
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com