Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Anaglogs Daughter
04 Feb 13 20:08
Joined:
Date Joined: 05 Jan 10
| Topic/replies: 29,477 | Blogger: Anaglogs Daughter's blog
http://www.markxdavies.com/
31-1-13

The post below is my latest column for Gaming Intelligence Quarterly, and was therefore written a few weeks ago. Notwithstanding the news about Ladbrokes and Betda q that has been announced since, I think it still stands. So I am reproducing it here now that the edition has been published.

As we move into the New Year, I thought I’d pick up a subject that I usually do my best to avoid: Betfair.

With more than two years now having passed since the company fell off its once lofty perch with a share price crash from the heady heights of £15.50 to below £8 – a level at which it has remained to this day – it seems a sensible moment to ask: whither the company in 2013?

We used to say at Betfair in the early days that the next six months were always the most crucial in the company’s history. It is funny to think that thirteen years on from its launch, that is probably as true of the next half as it ever was. Unless something happens over the next two quarters to restore confidence in the organisation, it will probably bump along forever at the sort of miserable levels that shareholders have now endured for some time.

I wasn’t expecting it would be like this. The company announced its new Chief Executive, Breon Corcoran, back in August 2011, and was sure enough it had the right man to believe that it was worth waiting a year to get him. It was fair, then, not to expect any share price recovery over that twelve month period. So, too, was it fair to expect little to happen in his early months, as he got his feet under his desk.

What probably wasn’t expected was a 10% price fall once he had announced his new strategy. Just when it felt like sub £7.50 would be a price of the past, the stock crashed back through support and started to plumb long-unseen depths.

But given that (in changing strategy to pull out of territories that are not ‘clearly legal’) Corcoran forfeited 24% of revenues at a stroke, you could say that a 10% fall was not a bad result. The question now is whether he will balance those losses with sufficient gains to recover to a more appropriate market cap.

£20m in cost savings announced in December is a good start, but I would imagine is really only that. The fact about Betfair that shocks people like no other is that it employs around 2,500 people around the world – a state of affairs I can’t imagine remaining for much longer. Years of dealing with structural issues by throwing people at the problem have taken their toll in a number of different ways: people both inside and outside the business have been frustrated for years by the level of bureaucracy, which (in combination with a framework that made it too easy to abdicate responsibility) has continually stifled the delivery of product.

The extent to which that is true is best illustrated by two things. The first is the sportsbook, which was delivered in 2011. I remember clearly when the need for it was first discussed, because the late Bob Horton was present at the management meeting in question. His role as Chairman was briefly executive in the fourth quarter of 2005.

The second is in-play – a product which Betfair was first to bring to market. Its loss of market share in this area, when the exchange model’s risk-management system is so well-suited to it, would be less frustrating had it not been talked about at such length over the years with nothing effective being done to reverse it.

By stripping out inefficiencies and creating accountability, I suspect Corcoran will have done more to put Betfair back on the right footing than analysts realise. I’ve piled back into the shares, down 10% or not

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 31
By:
racingstar
When: 04 Feb 13 20:12
Anybody buying into the original "Float Price" should be in a padded cell.
Saying that you have bought Shares does not mean you have done so,imo.
By:
onlooker
When: 04 Feb 13 20:34
"The second is in-play – a product which Betfair was first to bring to market.
Its loss of market share in this area, when the exchange model’s risk-management system is so well-suited to it, would be less frustrating had it not been talked about at such length over the years with nothing effective being done to reverse it.

By stripping out inefficiencies and creating accountability, I suspect Corcoran will have done more to put Betfair back on the right footing
----------------------

What, "inefficiencies," has Corcoran stripped out? ..... especially in regard to 'a LEVEL PLAYING FIELD'  - ....Which is the precise, "inefficiency,"that is now strangling Betfair LIQUIDITY.

- and as for - "creating accountability," - Well, if the 'pass the parcel' approach to creating the NEW Betfair site is an example -

Then that is an absolute FAILURE, aswell.
By:
racingstar
When: 04 Feb 13 20:38
You cannot turn back time,onlooker.
In Running is here and the incentive to be the "fastest finger" is in BF's interest (PC Charges).
By:
selhurst
When: 04 Feb 13 20:40
What about L/adbrokes purchase of the Purple Exchange ?
Won't that have a negative effect on share price ?
By:
bf_fananatic
When: 04 Feb 13 22:16
Dont put too much value on the choices of investors as many are quite capable of screwing up world markets
with bad decisions, as has been proven countless times in history.
By:
bf_fananatic
When: 04 Feb 13 22:18
Investors can be fickle in most areas and as many back poor favorites as invest in the wrong betting companies.
By:
racingstar
When: 04 Feb 13 22:44
The £15 Buyers will take great solace from your thoughts,BFF!
By:
Anaglogs Daughter
When: 04 Feb 13 22:48
The Purple site ...How can i explain without getting in trouble...Put it this way . . Desmond, JP, Yerman the bookie with the tache . . .And only now they are getting involved....Yeah...sure....whateva Shocked
By:
Blackwater
When: 05 Feb 13 00:47
It's worth noting perhaps that many bookmakers were betting evens on the rugby handicaps at the weekend.

Add 20/1 the draw, and that's a margin below 5% even before the customer shops around for the best line.

In other words, traditional bookies increasingly are offering prices on sport that compare well with post-commission prices on here.

And if BF doesn't offer the best price, it has little enough else going for it.

Obviously the company totally dominates a certain niche, but maybe that niche itself is topping out?
By:
efisio.
When: 05 Feb 13 01:20
They've certainly restored my confidence. Complained about getting caught by a trap bet, their answer? They suspend MY account. Amazing that the biggest controversy they have had in recent times was to call the bet with 'that' horse a while back, void as someone (bot) obviously placed huge amounts in error.
Now I have current bets that I can't even see because of the account being suspended. I've received no information as to why my account is suspended. Nice caring company.
By:
corbiewood
When: 05 Feb 13 09:14
mark knows the game imo.

apart from the quip regarding the exchange model fitting an inplay product so well. It doesnt, that is the number one issue.

An issue that they have addressed with a half arsed approach.
By:
use2begudear
When: 05 Feb 13 09:34
Complacency set in at Betfair a couple of years ago and the downward spiral began.Thought they could treat their loyal customers with contempt and do what they liked with charges etc.The answer from the "geniuses" at Betfair towers is to become like every other bookmaker and restrict accounts (or charge pc) and offer a "sportsbook" with odds worse than you get on the high street !! Priceless - Do you want to invest in this forward thinking and innovative company ?
By:
corbiewood
When: 05 Feb 13 09:43
clueless post
By:
YOMOMMA
When: 05 Feb 13 09:59
Why do betfair continually shoot themselves in the foot and are such failures?

lmax, beta website, loading..please wait while the market loads, now they've got their sportsbook as the default home page for anyone new going to betfair.com  The sportsbook will be another blue square it has nothing that all the other scores of bookies don't have and actually is worse value than the majority and will never compete with the likes of pinnacle and the asian bookies.
By:
use2begudear
When: 05 Feb 13 09:59
sorry to have a different opinion to you Laugh
By:
use2begudear
When: 05 Feb 13 09:59
@corbiewood
By:
corbiewood
When: 05 Feb 13 10:04
doesnt want to compete with asian bookies.....
By:
use2begudear
When: 05 Feb 13 10:09
corbiewood - I have sen plenty of postings by you and it appears that unless people agree with you then you put them down by calling them "clueless" or "unintelligent". You come across as a proper K N 0 B imo Laugh
By:
YOMOMMA
When: 05 Feb 13 10:12
When they launched they said death to the bookmaker and now they've become a bookmaker themselves. And a sh1t bookmaker at that.
By:
harold_lloyd
When: 05 Feb 13 10:14
well informed post - use2begudear 10:09
By:
corbiewood
When: 05 Feb 13 10:22
ok i apologise for being curt.

but you are just guessing....
By:
use2begudear
When: 05 Feb 13 10:29
curt is spelt with a n Shocked
By:
harold_lloyd
When: 05 Feb 13 10:32
use2begudear , curt is corbiewoods name , he is just apologising for him being him . if he meant to put an n in instead of r , surely he would have said

"ok i apologise for being a curt "
By:
dustybin
When: 05 Feb 13 10:34
Report• Quote • Block User use2begudear • February 5, 2013 10:29 AM GMT
curt is spelt with a n

So is knob Wink
By:
dustybin
When: 05 Feb 13 10:39
This is the most damming I've seen Mark be towards bf, although I agree with most of it.
Based on actually using the site daily I have seen a degradation and I wouldn't be optimistic enough to buy the product like mark seems to think is a good idea.
I've seen many leave this place and wondered why? But have now started to think it will soon be time to be more selective in the use of bf.
By:
unbiased
When: 05 Feb 13 10:47
Do you think any gambler would want to be without Betfair?It is still very very useful.
For my part the problem has been in trying to expand overseas,with the horrendous obstacles put in the way,like crazy tax regimes,thereby limiting the growth enormously.Yes,we will let you in,but the costs will be enormous,rendering it not worthwhile.
By:
dustybin
When: 05 Feb 13 10:52
That last line could have been written by a 60% PC payer.
By:
bilbobaggins
When: 05 Feb 13 11:04
Get rid of the PC which really can't bring in that much and watch them soar again.By killing the dream (the Pc) they drove a lot of people away and destroyed any word of mouth advertising. I used to tell anyone and everyone how great Betfair was to be able to make money - PC was introduced and I now actually warn people to stay away.

Utter madness.
By:
dustybin
When: 05 Feb 13 11:05
I'm a PC payer, but I have no advantage so I'm not at 60%
The last 6 months have been the hardest I can recall, and just like anybody, whether that's a 60%er or just a regular punter there comes a time where your time is better served doing other things, which means more ppl leave resulting in a quickening of the degradation IMO.
By:
wee eck
When: 05 Feb 13 12:02
Betfair, is like a Curate's egg very good in parts.
By:
vonDiestelBoy
When: 05 Feb 13 12:26
Betfair lost half of the Europe customers during regulation in these countrys. And in my opinion, running the Sportsbook under the same brand is the worse the betfair management ever could do. Why they have not grabbed one of the established bookies if they want to run a bookmaker business? The exchange turns from bad to worse with more and more markets useless for trading. The evil thing named PC in all the variations will give the exchange the kiss of death over the time.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com